A CRACK IN THE FOUNDATION OF WESTERN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

The truth never needs to be explained or apologized for.It stand alone as a sentinel for freedom of epression.

SHARIA law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.

The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.
Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.

Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims. It has now emerged that Sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire.

Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh. Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, whose Muslim Arbitration Tribunal runs the courts, said he had taken advantage of a clause in the Arbitration Act 1996. Under the act, the sharia courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The rulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, provided that both parties in the dispute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.

Siddiqi said: “We realized that under the Arbitration Act we can make rulings which can be enforced by county and high courts. The act allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals.

Thus, Humpty Dumpty has fallen in Great Britain and can never be put back together!
This is a classic example of open and ncouraged immigration for Muslims and a politicaly correct action to accomidate diversity and muti-culturism.

West's Florida Digest 2d, Volume 5 gives us a clear picture of our legal history. This volume notes that the "Common Law Of England" is in full force today, where there is no existing law that contradicts same, or when it is not in opposition to the U.S. or State Constitution or otherwise prohibited. Also, the term "Common Law Of England" does not refer solely to that developed in English courts, but has been expanded on by American courts as well.

It is a little known fact that the United States has adopted portions of English law, going all the way back to July 4, 1776. These laws were adopted by the United States and have been in effect from the beginning of our nation and are still in force today! Moreover, the origin of British common law, and subsequently that of our own American legal system which has been derived from Great Britain, has as its basis a Christian philosophy. source:Steven Costen

American and British Law is similar, and not identical because England still has a state church and ecclesiastical law has no direct counterpart here in the United States. However, despite the differences there is substantial common ground, especially in common law, between the two legal schemes.

The legislative workings of both the American and British courts is fundamentally the same, being driven mainly by judgments and opinions which are provided by superior courts in individual cases where matters of law are either in conflict, unclear or otherwise in doubt or dispute. In Our case the Supreme Court.

For this reason alone, I wonder how long time will elapse before there is a case brought before the Supreme Court to rcocognize Sharia law in disputes involving domestic disputes?

ANALYSIS OF THE LEFTIST MEDIA'S USE OF THE WORD THEOCRACY!

When Senator Goldwater ran for President against President for one year, Lyndon Johnson. The Democrat machine succeeded in portraying Goldwater as an extremist. Goldwater had a habit of making blunt statements about war, nuclear weapons, and economics that could be turned against him.

The most infamous attack on Goldwater was, the Johnson campaign broadcast a television commercial on September 7 dubbed the “Daisy Girl” ad, which featured a little girl picking petals from a daisy in a field, counting the petals, which then segues into a launch countdown and a nuclear explosion.
Another Johnson ad, “Confessions of a Republican”, tied Goldwater to the Ku Klux Klan. Voters increasingly viewed Goldwater as a right wing fringe candidate—his slogan “In your heart, you know he's right” was successfully parodied by the Johnson campaign into “In your guts, you know he's nuts,” or “In your heart, you know he might" (as in push the nuclear button), or even "In your heart, he's too far right."

The dirty tricks worked, and Johnson won in a "landslide". However, his domestic policies helped split union members and Southerners away from Franklin Roosevelt's Democratic New Deal Coalition, which would lead to the phenomenon of the "Reagan Democrat". Of the ten presidential elections that followed, Democrats would win only three times. Columnist George Will had this to say about the lasting effects of the 1964 election: "It took 16 years to count the votes, and Goldwater won."source: Wikapedia


Fast forward to today, and we find the "smarter than you are" leftist, secular Media is trying to accomplish the same results with Governor Palin. The interview by ABC's Leftist Charlie Gibson of Palin and his subsequent comments illustrate the animus the Left has for religion and those who have the "nerve" to profess it publicly, especially on television.

For the past years the atheist, agnostics, secularists have attacked President Bush, not because he has kept the USA free from a recurrence of 9/11/01, but because he is a professed Christian!
The animus by the so called intelligentsia, and the Left in general, for any display of Judeo-Christian values is on display each and every day for anyone to see if they open his/her eyes to see!

Although I am not accusing anyone of being a Communist. This type of attack by the Democratic party and the MSM plays directly into the hands of those who would love to see our Christian principles destroyed. They are willing accomplice's of the extreme Left!
To illustrate my point I have inserted a quote from a known Communist.

“And therefore, we adopt a ruthlessly irreconcilable attitude to anyone who utters a single word to the effect that mysticism or religious sentimentality might be combined with Communism. Religiousness is irreconcilable with the Marxian standpoint.
“We are of opinion that Atheism, as an inseparable element of the materialist view of life, is a necessary condition for the theoretical education of the revolutionist.
“He who believes in another world is not capable of concentrating all his passion on the transformation of this one." source: Letter from Leslie Mason to the British Communist Party

The deprecating on television of Gov. Palin and any other politician as being a Theocrat, defies credibility if you look at true theocracies. In Iran you have a true Theocracy. The Ayatolla Khomeini is the religious leader who "pulls the strings"on his "puppet" President!
Ruhollah ibn Mustafa Musawi Khomeini,was the symbol of the opposition facing the Shah. On April 1, 1979, Khomeini declared Iran an Islamic Republic and starts an era of strong religious dictatorship.
This is a Theocracy!!

ARE WE WITNESS TO THE DEMISE OF THE USA ECONOMY BIT BY BIT?

The television news, Radio, and Internet are awash with stories telling U.S.tax payers that another greedy Wall Street Baron is biting the dust!

U.S. taxpayers will bear the burden of the failure of this financial company and other financial firms, not just in the next year but over time. The Treasury may get money to cover the bill by pushing the deficit higher and borrowing money by selling bonds -- most of which will be snapped up by China. The IRS will want its "pound of flesh" at some point. That money will come from the pockets of the working man, or future, payroll deductions of our children.

This is a bad time for people like myself, who believed in the Capitalist System all our lives. It gives fodder to the Secular Socialists, and especially the Leftist controlled Democrat party at the most opportune time for them.

With Obama's popularity on the wane as more and more voters come to realize that he can talk the talk, but the way he walked the walk in the past belies his talk!

The problem simply is too much debt. In other words, the typical U.S. consumer is awash in debt brought about by the profligate use of credit cards. I believe some of the blame should be laid at the feet of the advertising sector of the World.

These are the people who put adds on television, radio, newspapers, magazines and even on the Internet, enticing us to buy a product that we should have," because we deserve it". Even if we cannot afford it. The Credit card companies are only too happy to oblige the card holder, because they make more money if you cannot pay the balance, but only pay the interest--usually 18% or more!

Couple this with the purchase of homes with little or no down payment, and barely enough income to support monthly payments. Overly aggressive lending practices by lenders,that poured millions of dollars into the home mortgage business, that were offered to these marginal home buyers at extremely low initial interest rates.

These low rates were come-ons, could and did escalate as the low initial offering rate period expired and the revised interest rates, in some cases, rose by 30-50%. These higher mortgage interest rates dramatically increased monthly payments, and over extended home purchasers simply did not have the income required to be able to make these increased payments. source:The Money Blog

To answer the financial crisis, the nine largest banks in the USA are forming a fund with a value of $70 billion. The banks are Bank of America (BAC), Barclays (BCS), Citigroup (C), Credit Suisse Group (CS), Deutsche Bank AG (DB), Goldman Sachs (GS), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Morgan Stanley (MS) and UBS AG (UBS).
Reuters reports that "any one of the 10 banks would be permitted to borrow up to one-third of the total facility." This will be on top of the Fed's plan to make more easy credit available to banks and brokerages.


Top Academic Economists believe this is a bad idea, because what becomes of the fund if any three of the members need to draw the 33% to which they are entitled? That would not only obliterate the fund. It would vex the other banks who might need capital if the credit crisis grows long and much worse. And the way things are going it may happen!
Many Economists believe this is a way to disguise a "BuyOut" plan that is disguised as a "bailout" by the three largest Capital Funds,Goldman Sachs, BAC and Deutsche Bank. These three have financial assets which are the envy of the others in the Banking business.

The underlying problem facing Americans is the continued devaluation of our Dollar. This will accompany this Bank crisis and the continued extension of credit to financial giants like now bankrupt Lehman. This will only lead to more predatory lending practices, inappropriate underwriting standards, and the potential consequences of securitization of debt instruments.

This includes the packaging of bundles of mortgages and other loans into a big single investment that are sold to pension funds and other investors around the world. If the early warnings had been heeded, the world "would have avoided the kind of meltdown we are experiencing today". source:David R. Francis

In 1995, over US $380 billion were in circulation, two-thirds of which was outside the United States. By 2005, that figure had doubled to nearly $760 billion, with an estimated half to two-thirds being held overseas,primaraly by Communit China, representing an annual growth rate of about 7.6%.
As of December 2006, the dollar was surpassed by the euro in terms of combined value, and of cash in circulation. Since then the current value of euro cash in circulation has risen to more than €695 billion, equivalent to US$991 billion at current exchange rates.

Wikapedia reports that: "Economist Paul Samuelson and others maintain that the overseas demand for dollars allows the United States to maintain persistent trade deficits without causing the value of the currency to depreciate and the flow of trade to readjust. Milton Friedman at his death believed this to be the case but, more recently, Paul Samuelson has said he now believes that at some stage in the future these pressures will precipitate a run against the U.S. dollar with serious global financial consequences!"

Hopefully, we will survive this financial crisis before the Chinese call in their notes. But all Americans, both Democrats and Republicans should realize that when so many people engaged in so many aspects of Our finance have lost their ethical compass, and put their short-term personal gains above their customers considerations.The end result is default!
This was the case in the subprime mortgage market in the U.S. It has had a profound macroeconomic impact. Putting it simply, the broad economy gets hurt by greed and selfishness as ensuing financial losses mount and trust fades. source: Christian Science Monitor


Another factor to consider is the possible election of a President who promises to introduce more expensive Wekfare programs that will further burden the taxpayers. This would be a fatal financial mistake!

ON THE WAY TO CAUCASIANS BECOMING THE MINORITY

According to opponents of the selection of Gov. Palin. “The Palin family's five children would have been unexceptional forty years ago, but today constitute something of a fertility freak show."source: AP News
This is not only a political verbal insult to America's large families, but an unwarranted slam of Gov. Palin's family.
The facts unfortunately are true, however. The USA and Europe are rapidly loosing their individual identity due to low birth rates of the indigenous Caucasian population.

Census reports from France, Spain and Germany show us that Caucasian indigenous growth has steadily declined for the past decade. Only the mass influx of immigrants from Muslim countries, and modern medicine that has kept people living longer, has kept these countries from a negative population growth.

Researchers writing in the Journal of Science said European population growth reached a turning point in the year 2000 when the number of children dropped to a level that statistically assured there will be fewer parents in the next generation than there are in the current generation.

Between now and 2050, the United Nations predicts that while EU population declines,
Muslim Countries like Yemen will grow to 102 million. An increase of 24 times it's 1950 population. During that same time period, Muslim population in the EU will increase by 500,000 immigrants during the same period. source: UN study.

In effect, the authors say, the momentum for population growth in the 15-nation European Union has flipped from positive to negative and the trend could strongly influence population numbers throughout the 21st century.

Unfortunately, despite these statistics, many people in the World, believe that we must slow population growth. Communist China has instituted the "one child for family" dictate. And there are those who claim that people with fewer children are better off economically and are usually more able to save and invest for their retirement than if they had spent their money on raising more children. An example of a purely selfish secularist reasoning!
These people believe and advocate. "That We need to go, for some time period, below the replacement level of two offspring per female. We need to drop world human population down to some Ecocentrically defined "Optimum" size. This is sick, selfish and faulty reasoning if we hope to survive as a Judeo-Christian Nation.

In Europe the deficit in birth rate has been filled by immigration which threatens to be so large that Europe will loose it's European identity to that of an immigrant society, predominantly Muslim.


According to the most recent census data, only 1.1 percent of non-Hispanic white women bear five or six children over the course of their lifetime. By contrast, 22.5 percent of these women never reproduce. The percentage of childlessness among women rises in a straight line with educational attainment."

Fertility, and thus birth rates, in a population can be significantly affected by social trends that encourage women to delay starting a family. Although this has had a major effect on the European population, it has not been a major factor in the United States.
In the 20th century, the average age at first birth of mothers shifted sharply from the low 20s to the late 20s. As the trend toward having the first child continues to advance toward an older age it locks in a decline in natural population growth, said O'Neill.

Were it not for high immigration levels, the United States would be facing population decline in the 21st century, because of low mortality and below-replacement fertility. A nice way of explaining the death rate due to abortion of over a million each year!In 2005 there were 1.25 million abortions in the USA.So while Americans and European Caucasians are concerned with "population explosion". The Blacks, Orientals and Muslim nations are growing their populations at a rapid pace!
The resulting mass immigration has destabilized the entire European continent. The EU, which should more properly be called the anti-European Union. The Eu is facilitating the influx of Muslim immigrants.I believe that every day the EU exists brings Europe one step closer to IT'S DEMISE, and the new Caliphate!

It is a fact that America's face has dramatically changed, as she has become both host and mother to millions of immigrants from Asia, Latin America and Europe during the last several decades. The annual total of foreign-born people immigrating to the United States has climbed from 500,000 in the 1970’s to more than a million at present. The Hispanic population alone has grown from nine million in 1970 to nearly 35 million today.
And only seven years after 9/11, Muslims are pouring into the country in "surprising numbers." Nearly 96,000 Muslims became legal permanent US residents in 2006 — the most in two decades. This only counts legal immigrants — many more are taking advantage of our government's unconscionable refusal to stem illegal immigration. Many Muslims come in "as students and tourists who sometimes overstay their welcome." Others stroll across the border from Mexico.

The largest number of Muslim immigrants come from three main sources: South Asia, Iran, and the Arabic-speaking countries. The single largest group of Muslim immigrants are those from South Asia (meaning Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan), followed by perhaps 500,000 Iranians and 400,000 from the Arab countries. Shi'is, who make up about 10 percent of the worldwide Muslim population, probably comprise about the same percentage of the U.S. Muslim population.source: Wikapedia

All the above verbiage can be summed up in these words; We need to elect some one to the Presidency who will see that our borders are closed to illegals!

THE JUDICIAL ROAD TO LOSS OF THE REPUBLIC

The Supreme Court was established in 1789, at which time it had no home building of it own.By 1836 during the Marshall Courts tenure(1801-1836) SCOTUS had declared it to be the arbiter of the Constitution in the Marbury vs. Madison decision.

It is the first case read by virtually every first-year law student and is generally considered the greatest of all landmark cases. Marshall strained to reach his result. The plain words of Section 13 of the Judiciary Act indicate that Marbury went to the wrong court or invoked the wrong statute (or both), but Marshall proceeded as if the suit were authorized by Section 13 and then declared the statute unconstitutional on the grounds that it purported to expand the Court's original jurisdiction in violation of Article III. Marbury's suit was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Marshall's decision--brilliant in its conception--allowed the Court to brand Jefferson a violator of civil rights without issuing an order that the President could have ignored. source: Exploring Constitutional Conflicts
The concept was also laid out by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78:
“ If it be said that the legislative body are themselves the constitutional judges of their own powers, and that the construction they put upon them is conclusive upon the other departments, it may be answered, that this cannot be the natural presumption, where it is not to be collected from any particular provisions in the Constitution. It is not otherwise to be supposed, that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were authoritydesigned to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their . The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It, therefore, belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents."

Although the previous paragraph is lengthy it illustrates the need to have strict Constitutional thinkers on the Supreme Court. Unfortunately we have not had them as history will illustrate.

The Warren Court mandated busing of school children and placement of children in schools, not in their home neighborhoods, to satisfy racial preferences and further integration. This has resulted in great costs to the taxpayer, especially now when gas costs $4.00 a gallon, and the destruction of primary education as the test scores have showed.

The Burger Court is infamous for It's Roe vs. Wade decision that has allowed the American genocide of tens of millions of unborn and partially born babies!!

No decision of the Supreme Court in the twentieth century has been as controversial as the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision holding that women have a right to choose to have an abortion during the first two trimesters of a pregnancy.

Attorneys for Roe had suggested several constitutional provisions might be violated by the Texas law prohibiting abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother. The law was said to have been an establishment of religion in violation of the First Amendment, unconstitionally vague (the ground used in Blackmun's first draft of his opinion), a denial of equal protection of the laws, and a violation of the Ninth Amendment (which states that certain rights not specified in the first eight amendments are reserved to the people).

The Court in Roe chose, however, to base its decision on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the so-called "right of privacy" protected in earlier decisions such as Griswold v Connecticut (striking down a ban on the use, sale, and distribution of contraceptives). Deciding HOW to protect the right to an abortion proved as difficult.

Justice Blackmun's approach, one clerk at the time said, "As a practical matter, was not a bad decision--but as a constitutional matter it was absurd." Roe's trimester-based analysis generally prohibits regulation of abortions in the first trimester, allows regulation for protecting the health of the mother in the second trimester, and allows complete abortion bans after six months, the approximate time a fetus becomes viable.
For those who say "Women have a right to choose." I ask you, choose what? Their choice to have an abortion is not a right one can find anywhere in the Constitution. It is license, plain and simple.
The Due Process Clause:United States Constitution states he following:

"No State shall...deprive any person of life, liberty,
or property, without due process of law."

Even former leaders of Planned Parenthood admit that the "fetus" is a living being! When a pregnant woman is murdered, the law requires that the perpetrator be charged not only with the murder of the woman, but also the murder of the baby in the womb! Go figure!!
If the right to choose is really a constitutional right, why go on to ask whether the regulation unduly burdens that right? Do we ask whether a modest tax on public speaking would unduly burden speech?

Ask yourselves these questions: Is there a state interest in preserving respect for life that is weakened by allowing abortions? If abortions are not immoral, would you call them morally dubious? Why is infanticide morally wrong (if you believe that to be the case) and abortion not immoral?
On the other hand, why is aborting a first-trimester fetus (before the fetus has significant neurological development, emotions, or any other critical attributes of humanness) any more more immoral than killing, for example, pigs that do have thoughts and emotional lives? Could you argue, in fact, that killing a pig is the more immoral act? Until we can stop the degrading of the moral values of this once great Republic, we shall continue to slide down the slimy slope to perdition and demise as did the Romans, Soviets and all Nations that debauched themselves out of existence!

COLD WAR II IS BEGINNING !!

The London Daily Telegraph has disclosed that Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, reacted with fury when Mr Miliband and he spoke on the telephone. Mr Lavrov objected to being lectured by the British.

"Such was the repeated use of the "F-word" according to one insider who has seen the transcript, it was difficult to draft a readable note of the conversation.

One unconfirmed report suggested that Mr Lavrov said: "Who are you to f------ lecture me?"

He also asked Mr Miliband in equally blunt terms whether he knew anything of Russia's history.

One Whitehall insider said: "It was effing this and effing that. It was not what you would call diplomatic language. It was rather shocking."

The Foreign Secretary had been putting forward Britain and Europe's objections to the actions of Russia, which began when their tanks rolled into the breakaway region of South Ossetia last month. Mr Miliband has said that Europe should reassess its ties with Russia after its "aggressive" behaviour.

It is also reported that Mr Miliband was asked by Lavrov, about Britain and America's invasion of Iraq, when Russian actions in Georgia were questioned, during the tense conversation that took place recently.

Sources at the British Foreign Office confirmed there was swearing "but only from one side". source: London Times

At the same time that this conversation, or should I call it confrontation, was taking place two Russian, "BlackJack", jet bombers ,capable of carrying nuclear weapons was flying to Venezuela.

Russia downplayed the two strategic long-range bombers that flew to Venezuela in the first such flight since the Cold War, saying the bombers carried no live weapons — nuclear or otherwise — and would return to Russia next week.

The bombers arrived in South America ahead of planned joint military maneuvers between Russia and Venezuela — maneuvers that appear to be a tit-for-tat retort to the United States for sending warships to deliver aid to U.S.-allied Georgia following last month's war.

Russian analysts said it was the first time strategic bombers have landed in the Western Hemisphere since the Cold War. The foray, and the coming military exercises with an avowed U.S. enemy, are likely to strain the already tense relationship between Moscow and Washington.

Russian air force Maj. Gen. Pavel Androsov said in televised comments that the Tu-160bombers were carrying only test missiles. Yes and I am seven foot -two, also!!!He said the jets would conduct several test flights over neutral waters then return to Russia on Monday. That indicates that the jets would not participate in military exercises that Venezuela and Russia plan to hold in the Caribbean Sea sometime this year.

The deployment — which will include a naval squadron and long-range patrol planes — is expected to be the largest Russian naval maneuvers in the Caribbean and perhaps the Western Hemisphere since the Cold War.

Despite the protests from Russia, it would appear that Putin and company is establishing a potential military base of operations similar to that of Nikita Khruschev back in the Kennedy years. When the Soviet Union Put nuclear missiles in Cuba.
The so called "military exercise" is far more threatening than our Country's sending a few ships with aid to Georgia to aid a besieged nation, that was invaded by Russian tanks and bombed by Russian planes!

Russia has the Baltic Sea, North Atlantic and the Pacific oceans to carry out naval exercises. They do not need to come into the south Atlantic off Venezuela to conduct naval maneuvers unless they are trying to show the Us their ability to establish a military threat within the Western Hemisphere, well in range of their nuclear missiles!

CHANGING THE SUBJECT IS NO WAY TO DEFEND YOURSELF

Sorry, Barrack but you cannot compare quoting what you said, to "swiftboating", and lies!

The Associated Press is reporting that, "Obama began a discussion of education at a Norfolk high school on Wednesday by assailing McCain's campaign.
Obama responded to the Republicans' charge that he was referring to Palin when he used the phrase "lipstick on a pig" at a campaign stop Tuesday.
"I don't care what they say about me. But I love this country too much to let them take over another election with lies and phony outrage and Swift-boat politics. Enough is enough," he said".

Only guilty and desperate people protest when the record shows that the words quoted have been uttered by the protester!

Barack Obama used the phrase "lipstick on a pig" to describe his opponents' mantra of change.His actual words were:" “...You can put lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig".
The Republican campaign called Obama's analogy a “disgusting” and sexist comment clearly aimed at vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin. These are the facts!
At the Republican convention Gov. Palin uttered this;" that the only difference between a hockey mom like herself and a pitbull was “lipstick.”

Former Governor Jane Swift of Massachusetts had this to say about Obama's comments.“I can only deem to be disgusting comments, comparing our vice presidential nominee, Governor Palin, to a pig,” she said in a conference call with reporters. Swift, chair of the newly-formed Palin Truth Squad, demanded Obama apologize for the comment which she likened to childish name-calling. source:The New Media Journal

For those of you who cannot make the connection between Gov. Palin and Obmaa's "lip stick" comment. Think for a moment how many of the four nominees for the high offices of President and Vice-President, wear lipstick!

If the Democrats tried they could not alienate the average American more than what they are trying to do in tearing down VP nominee Pali. Keep it up, and you will be able to watch her move into Blair House next January!!

THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS BAIL OUT?

President Bush once again gave a talking point to the Democrats with his decision to bail out Freddie Mack and Freddie Mae.
The whole world gave a sigh of relief while thinking Americans cursed under their collective breath, "not again:!

Our government will guarantee the debt held by foreign creditors but for the American worker who paid into Social Security for forty years will have to take "reductions" in benefits, and face an already insolvent program that will only get worse if the recipients are not culled! This is insane!

The bail out appears to be for the benefit of two Countries that are if not enemies, at least a threat to our way of life. China and Russia. Japan and of all places, the Cayman Islands. Home to more bank laundering than the Swiss!

Since 1994 when the Chinese had 197 million invested in our mortgage giants. They have increased their investment to 1.3 TRILLION dollars. They practically own the "FREDDIES"!

Being a life long hater of Communism, I have the inclination to let the chips fall where they will, and if the Chinese Communists and the quasi- Communist Russians take a financial bath. So be it!
And without efforts to keep up with China and India, some countries, including the USA, may see further erosion of their export shares and high-tech manufacturing sectors.Why help their quest for world power?

I lost a considerable amount of money in the 2002 stock market "mini"-crash, caused by a bear market correction and the accounting manipulation scandals, and no one in the government made good on my loses.
My children are all paying into the social security fund(it is not a trust fund). and they will probably never see any benefits from it, because their are too many free loaders and illegals dipping into it via medicaid and other corrupt welfare programs.

In a news conference today, Secretary Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said the government has three objectives: "market stability, mortgage availability and taxpayer protection." That's another signal that the government wants mortgages to remain available, at good rates, to borrowers with a low risk of default.

Tell me how he is protecting the taxpayer, please. The federal government is not a revenue producing machine. It is a profligate spending machine that has been out of control far too long. The taxpayers will get the bill for this bail out in some manner. All so we protect foreign investments in a mortgage scheme that continues to lend to people who want something beyond their ability to pay for it!

A SLIP OF THE TONGUE?

"In one of the most astonishing gaffes in American political history, in a national televised interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulus, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama referred to "my muslim faith," confirming what researchers and political opponents have been claiming". source: IsraelInsider

The following is a verbatim quote of an excerpt from the ABC television program during which Obama's slip of his tongue or his heart speaking the truth, is printed for all that have proclaimed that Obama is not a Muslim. I ask this question? If he is not a Muslim at heart, who may or may not be a foreign born Muslim masquerading as a Christian, why did he utter the following?


STEPHANOPOULOS: But John McCain said the same thing about questioning your faith.

OBAMA: And what was the first thing the McCain?s campaign went out and did? They said, look, these liberal blogs that support Obama are out there attacking Governor Palin.

Let's not play games. What I was suggesting -- you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith. And you're absolutely right that that has not come--

STEPHANOPOULOS: Christian faith.

OBAMA: -- my Christian faith. Well, what I'm saying is that he hasn't suggested-- and following

So far there has been no follow up coverage of this statement by the Obama campaign staff or the Media. More to follow you can be sure!
And there is still a controversy brewing over the authenticity of the Obama birth certificate that both the Daily Kos and Obama's campaign has released. Is it authentic?

Enemies Become Friends and Friends Become Enemies

Only the twisted logic of a KGB operative could utter such a statement and not expect a adverse response from the USA. The Cold War has begun again!!
The sabre rattling of Putin last week remind me of the vitriolic rhetoric of Soviet dictators like Nikita Khrushchev.

The Sunday issue of the London Times has this to say about Putin's threats toward the USA, because of our aid to still occupied Georgia.
From The Sunday Times September 7, 2008
"Vladimir Putin set to bait US with nuclear aid for Tehran. Russia is considering increasing its assistance to Iran’s nuclear programme in response to America’s calls for Nato expansion eastwards and the presence of US Navy vessels in the Black Sea delivering aid to Georgia.
The Kremlin is discussing sending teams of Russian nuclear experts to Tehran and inviting Iranian nuclear scientists to Moscow for training, according to sources close to the Russian military.
Moscow has been angered by Washington’s promise to give Georgia aid following the Russian invasion of parts of the country last month after Tbilisi’s military offensive. Kremlin officials are angered because of U.S. renewed support for attempts by Georgia and Ukraine to join Nato.
Last week a third US Navy ship entered the Black Sea with aid bound for Georgia. Moscow has accused the Americans of using the vessels to deliver weapons but has failed to provide any evidence.

“Everything has changed since the war in Georgia,” said one source. “What seemed impossible before, is more than possible now when our friends become our enemies and our enemies our friends. What are American ships doing off our coast? Do you see Russian warships off the coast of America? My comment is there are most probably Russian nuclear subs consantly in or near American waters!
“Russia will respond. A number of possibilities are being considered, including hitting America there where it hurts most – Iran.”

Russia has already agreed to supply Syria with missiles, so this is not anything new. Russia and France were supplying weapons and nuclear scientists to the regime of Saddam Hussein before the Iraq war began.

As much as career diplomats attempt to convince the American people that Russia is a friend, Putin and his puppet President have demonstrated they are anything but friends! With apologies to Winston Churchill; The Russians are either at your feet or at your throat. Why do they have such a chip on their shoulder? All they have to do to get along is to leave their neighbors alone. Stop acting like Stalin!

Putin justified his invasion of Georgia's sovereign territory because South Ossetia had broken away from Georgia, and Georgia was attacking the rebellious province.Russia's aggression marked the Kremlin's first military assault on foreign soil since the Soviet Union's Afghanistan intervention, which ended in 1989.
This contrasted with the attempt of the Chechens to break away from the Soviet Union during the dictatorship of Boris Yeltsin, and the war that ensued in 1991. Russia bombed and rolled tanks into Grozny, when Chechnia attempted Independence by declaring it was a Sovereign State, independent of Russia.
I guess that is what he meant by "friends who become enemies and enemies become friends. There is no way Russia was ever a friend of our Republic as history has shown. Berlin Wall anyone??

THE ISSUE IS ENERGY NOT REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH!!

While Obama has tacitly agreed that we need to drill off-shore his economic plan that includes increased taxation on corporations, "even if it decreases government revenue, to be fair".
The Democrat platform includes universal health care, projected minimum wage increases by government mandate and coercion. All of which will put a burden on the tax payers, despite his lies that he will all be on the rice! The "trickle down effect" of mandated minimum wage increases and increased taxation of corporation will just be passed on to the consumer. All are not rich!!

The real issue in this November's election is "SAVE THE ECONOMY, DRILL NOW"!!!

Sarra Palin articulated the issue well when she described that the area in ANWR that is targeted for drilling is no more than a foot print in the vastness of Alaska's wilderness.
America-first energy policy, is what she and McCain are advocating. It will create millions of high-paying jobs with complete government deregulation and decontrol of the full menu of energy sources: oil, natural gas, nuclear, clean coal, shale and the alternative fuels of wind, solar and cellulosic.

The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that there are nearly 100 billion barrels of oil in the Arctic, with roughly one-third under sovereign U.S. territory in Alaska. There are at least 10 billion (and perhaps close to 20 billion) barrels of oil in ANWR, while old estimates suggest between 800 billion and 2 trillion barrels of oil in the Rocky Mountain shale formations.

It's also worth noting that 1.8 billion acres of the Outer Continental Shelf -- with roughly 100 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 400 trillion feet of natural gas -- are off-limits because of the Democrat controlled congressional moratorium.

And yet, Obama and the Democrats expect the voters to elect him to lead this country?
He proposes increased taxation of oil companies. And all he talks about is a windfall profits tax. That's is no real economic recovery plan. He has shown no interest in reducing gasoline prices at the pump. He even sponsored legislation to prevent 3-D seismic technology and other research efforts to correctly measure our undersea oil deposits.source: Congressional record

When next you fill up your gas tank ask yourself whether what Obama promises is really going to help anyone but those who have already jumped on the government "gravy train".Even the poor won't benefit, because despite claims to the contrary. Government does less for poor people than do private groups like the Salvation Army and Catholic Charities.
If the cost of oil doesn't come down the cost of food and housing will increase proportional to their costs for fuel to deliver goods and services.

Unless you believe in Marxist Socialism you have to vote Republican!!

PUTTING THE RIGHT FACE ON OBAMA'S COMMUNIY SERVICE

Posted by Jax Hawk on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:55:45 PM
"Angry community organizers defended their work, and that of former colleague Barrack Obama, as they fought back yesterday against a series of gibes by speakers at the Republican convention. Organizers described themselves as an antidote to the influence of big-money lobbyists. They cited helping the powerless join forces to demand better schools and safer streets, often by working through churches. SOURCE:msnbc
During the half time of last nights NFL football game, NBc interrupted the usual football analyst's presentation, to cover the Republican convention. This is appropriate considering the closeness of the Presidential race, but then they inserted a video of Obama replying to Vice-Presidential nominee, Gov. PALIN'S remarks about Obama's Chicago Community Organizing not being executive experience.
Obama tried to make the point, as most Democrats do, that the Republicans are not concerned about poor, homeless people.

What he didn't say is more important than what he said!
Obama's community service involved radical groups like ACORN, and other left wing political types to get out the vote. He was not helping them, he was helping himself get elected to the US Senate.
His only quasi-philanthropic endeavored was the Annenberg project to help inner city schools. But all this accomplished was to spread millions of dollars around political cronies. The records of the money spent and who got the lions share is no where to be found!

Rudy Giuliani and Sarah Palin specifically mocked Barack's experience as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago more than two decades ago. We need to clarify something for them right now. Community organizing is how ordinary people respond to out-of-touch politicians and their failed policies."

"Neither Palin nor Giulani were mocking community organizers in church basements and community centers across the country working to improve their neighbors’ lives. What deserves ridicule is the notion that Obama's brief period as a Chicago South Side organizer for tax-subsidized, partisan nonprofits, qualifies as executive experience" source:Town Hall.

What deserves criticism is “community organizing” that relies on a community of homeless people and radicals to organize for the purpose of registering among others, dead people to vote, and using the race card as a bludgeon.

Obama's community organizing days involved training grievance-mongers from the far-left ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). The ACORN group is infamous for its bully tactics (which they dub “direct actions"); Obama supporters have recounted his role in organizing an ambush on a government planning meeting about a landfill project opposed by Chicago's minority lobbies.source:Chicago Tribune

With benefactors like Obama in office, ACORN has managed to garner four decades of government subsidies to prop up chapters that promote the welfare state and undermine the free market, as well as some that have been implicated in perpetuating illegal immigration and voter fraud.
Look up 'Community Organizers' on monster or careebuilder. None. No jobs. Zipo. No where in the country.
Go to any college or university and look up the discipline 'Community Organizer' - None. Zipo.
Lets call it what it is Obama. You were just scoring political points and lining up lobbyists for a run at a state senate seat. You couldn't have cared less about the community you were "working" in.

THE LEFTS NON-STARTER!!

I do not usually watch political conventions, because of the hot air and hyperbole that are associated with this type event.
But I had to watch last nights speech by Vice-President designate, Governor Palin.And I was both surprised and disgusted by what I saw.

The speech by Gov. Plain was a stem winder,it reminded me of the speeches we heard from the late great President Reagan. She took no prisoners, said what she thought of Obama and his minions with style and substance.
Then the Left waded into the mud!!
I was watching the MSNBC feed to our local cable system, and the claws were bared by all who commented on the speech. Every last one admitted she spoke well, but they all uniformly took the position that she ignored the issues of the economy and health care.They slyly avoided talking about National defense and the threat of terrorism!

This was the designated topic to attack both Palin and the Republicans. The "announcers" made a big deal out of the fact that both Obama and Biden had talked about the poor economy and promised Universal Heal Care, but I have yet to hear a solution from either man.
The problem is, the two do not necessarily go together. I am no economist, but simple arithmetic tells me that if you spend billions giving people "Quality" free medical care without raising taxes drastically, you will put an even greater strain on the economy.
The economy is not doing so bad after all. Most of the "EU" would love to have economic growth of 3.3%( that is from April l08 to June 08), as we do! Yes, their are lost jobs, but employment is still lower than it's high in 2002 when we had 457,000 out of work. The present number does need to be reduced by the next Administration, but you cannot help people to get to work if you raise taxes on the employers. The result in increased taxation is layoffs!! Even President Kennedy knew that, so he slashed taxes and improved government income by increasing productivity!

WE must all remember that the tax and spend Democrats want us to elect an empty suit who has no executive experience, but advocates increased taxation on those who make money so he can give it to those who don't! Lenin promised the peasants he would give them all that the landowner had, but all they got was hunger, death and loss of their religion. Obama is no Lenin, but he is on the road to dialectic collectivism I am sure!!

SOCIALIST OR REPUBLICAN, YOU CHOOSE!

The Media has chosen their "Black Messiah", and are frantic because a new wrinkle has been inserted into the Presidential race. A WOMAN!!
Now voters have two firsts to contemplate. A first"Quasi" Black man(his mother was white) and a Woman on opposite sides of the political spectrum.
Democrats represent the elected elite, so called intelligentsia, and the "gimme-gimme" group that wants the government to take care of them from the cradle to the grave.
Now comes a self made,pro-life Feminist who is not afraid to shatter the glass ceiling. In fact she has broken it to pieces in Alaska. AS governor and previous mayor, she is the poster women for all Women who believe in JUdeo-Christian values and the right to succeed on your own hard work without interference from "Big Brother" government.

Despite all her accomplishments the Media left has put a full court press to try and destroy her even before the Republican convention is closed!
A perfect example of the fear and hatred in the hearts and minds of the Left is the statement by Andrea Mitchell on Sundays Meet The Press. Ske had the unmitigated Gaul to say this; "She is not appealing to the same women who were really voting or supporting Hillary Clinton on ideological issues but they think that they can peel off some of these working class women, not college educated, who, the blue collar women who were voting for Hillary Clinton and may be more conservative on social causes.the italics are mine!

So, only the stupid, uneducated, working class ninnies will be somehow fooled into voting for the McCain/Palin ticket, Andrea? Those that are smart, educated, upper class women are too clever for that? Is that what we are saying here, Andrea?

Democrats obsess over class distinctions. This betrays a psychological need to consign others to second-class status in attempts to assign themselves the role of America's hereditary nobles - condescending to attend to the wants of their commoner-constituents while on campaign to recapture Camelot-on-Potomac. Example, Queen Pelosi, and all the Princes of the Democrat controlled Congress, who strut and speak as though they were Royalty!
But while most Americans consider today's true Royals to be a species of celebrity whose lives and antics are, at times, worthy of attention and gossip, we would never look to them for governance. We place our faith in self-made men and women of accomplishment.A case in point is Gov. Palin , the choice of McCain for his VP running mate.

"When the smoke clears, the fireworks end, and the ugly/lying words are over, the facts remain: Senator Obama still has no record of anything but Leftist tax and spend accomplishments.He still opposes offshore drilling, he voted to raise taxes on those making just $42,000 per year, and he voted against funds for American troops in harm's way. The fact remains: Barrack Obama is still not ready or qualified to be President."
And for those of you who still believe in voting for someone who has moral values. Obama is and always will be a friend of those advocating partial birth abortion, defeat of THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.While in the Illinois State Senate, he blocked emergency medical aid for babies who survived abortion!
On the Republican side you have Gov.Palin who marched with Feminists for Life, and is the mother of five children!

Obama speaks vaguely about “change, ”but Obama’s brand of change is a hostile attack on the Judeo-Christian values and freedoms most Americans hold dear.
This isn’t “change you can believe in”—it is change designed to uproot American culture and replace it with the failed, secular, socialist policies of the failed Russian and European governments.

RADICALS HOPE TO WRECK REPUBLICANS AS THEY DID DEMS. IN 1968

Forty years ago in Chicago the anti-war protesters ruined the Democratic convention with their anarchist riots, and with it went any chance to win the Presidential election the following November.
The radical left, unlike the Obfuscating Lame Stream Media has a good memory about this event.
So good that were their efforts, they are trying to wreak havoc on the Republicans in Minnesota, as they did in Chicago, with hopes of the same results!

At least 250 people were arrested outside the Republican Convention last night as police used tear gas and pepper spray to disperse rioters attacking property and blocking roads in protest at the war in Iraq. They had come in their thousands – grandmothers, veterans, young families and even disgruntled Republicans bearing banners and peace flags. And for the most part, the demonstrations passed off peacefully. But once the main antiwar march had finished, splinter groups embarked on a violent rampage, smashing windows, slashing car tyres, throwing bottles and even attacking Republican delegates attending the nearby Xcel Centre. Many of those involved identified themselves to reporters as anarchists. These protesters, some clad in black, wreaked havoc by damaging property and starting at least one fire. The Minnesota National Guard sent 150 soldiers to help police tackle the riots, which flared as delegates were assembling in St. Paul for the four-day meeting

Terry Butts, a former Alabama Supreme Court justice who is a convention delegate, was on a bus taking delegates to the arena when a brick thrown through a window sprayed glass on him and two others. Mr Butts said he wasn’t hurt. “It just left us a little shaken,” he said. “It was sort of a frightening moment because it could have been a bomb or a Molotov cocktail." Five people were arrested for lighting a rubbish bin on fire and pushing it into a police car, St. Paul police spokesman Tom Walsh said. Of those arrested, 119 faced possible felony charges. At least four journalists were among those detained, including Associated Press photographer Matt Rourke and Amy Goodman, host of Democracy Now!, a nationally syndicated public radio and TV news program. source: Hannah Strange's article and London Times

Chicago ‘68 doomed the candidacy of Hubert Humphrey and set off shock waves of reform. For the Left, Chicago ‘68 hastened the demise of SDS and intensified the revolutionary fervor that would spawn street violence and bombings. For the media, Chicago ‘68 created a deep suspicion of the state and its minions. For Chicago, Chicago ‘68 weakened support for the last of the big-city bosses and fanned the flames of political reform.
This blog is to remind those who forgot that Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn, both friends and associates of Barrack Obama,founded the Weathermen.
Weatherman, known colloquially as the Weathermen and later the Weather Underground Organization, was an American radical left organization founded in 1969 by leaders and members who split from the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). The group organized a riot in Chicago in 1969 and bombed buildings in the 1970s.

They took their name from the lyric "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows," from the Bob Dylan song Subterranean Homesick Blues. They also used this lyric as the title of a position paper they distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969, as part of a special edition of New Left Notes. The Weathermen were initially part of the Revolutionary Youth Movement (RYM) within the SDS, splitting from the RYM's Maoists by claiming there was no time to build a vanguard party and that revolutionary war against the United States government and the capitalist system should begin immediately. Their founding document called for the establishment of a "white fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other "anti-colonial" movements[1] to achieve "the destruction of US imperialism and achieve a classless world: world communism."source:Wikapedia

The Weathermen are responsible for multiple terrorist acts, including the bombings of the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, Ft. Dix and office buildings in various U.S. cities. In fact, the group claimed credit for 12 terrorist bombings between 1970 and 1974 alone; and while no innocent civilians were killed:


But I doubt their protest and resort to violence will help elect their "savior". Too many people are tired of violence in the streets by people who preach Peace and Love, but resort to violence outside the boundaries of Democratic reform!!

IS THE OBAMA /BIDEN A THREAT TO ISRAEL'S SECURITY?

The Jerusalem Post is reporting that Army Radio in Israel, monitored a talk between Senator Joe Biden in closed conversations with Jerusalem officials three years ago "that he was firmly opposed to an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities".
Biden, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee, reportedly claimed "that Israel would likely have to come to terms with a nuclear Iran. He reportedly expressed doubt over the effectiveness of economic sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic and said he was against the opening of an additional military and diplomatic front, saying that the US had more pressing problems, such as North Korea and Iraq".
My sources could not confirm this talk, but it is apparent that the top half of the Democratic ticket is perceived as a man favored by the Palestinians in Gaza.
The same issue of the J.Post reported and showed a film strip of a phone bank of 25 Palestinian college age men making telephone calls using the Internet to influence voters in America to vote for Obama.
The Palestinian who "hatched" this scheme stated to reporters that "they are calling from Gaza to ask those that contact to vote for Obama because he is a man of peace"!

Army Radio said that "Jerusalem officials expressed amazement at the comments and were wondering which position to take seriously, that of Biden or Obama, who declared last Monday that the world must press Iran through sanctions and diplomacy to stop its nuclear program, so that Israel does not feel its "back is against the wall" and that it therefore has no choice but to attack".

"The position of the vice presidential candidate puts a huge question mark over the degree of empathy the Obama administration would display concerning one of the greatest threats Israel faces," they said.

Unfortunately a man of Peace at all costs has no business having the position of Commander in Chief of all USA forces during a time of war! And do not delude yourself, we are involved in a war. A conflict for the very existence of freedom and liberty in the Western Hemisphere and Israel.

Tyrants throughout the ages have attacked armed and unarmed, unprepared adversaries. This is true even in our own recent history. In World War I, Germany went to war with a well-armed France and England. In World War II, the Allies and Russia were not without arms. But that did not prevent Germany from once again attacking them.

MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD has stated clearly on numerous occasions that he plans to destroy the State of Israel and its inhabitants. Tyrants and madmen often disclose exactly what they intend to do if they get the opportunity. For example, Adolph Hitler clearly articulated his views on the Jewish people which he wrote in Mein Kampf and constantly espoused in public speeches. The problem is not non-disclosure of intent; it is the intended victim's leaden ears. Let us not bee fooled by slick talking politicians who offer change, but will be willing to concede anything to those who threaten us to maintain this false peace we find ourselves in today.