RUSSIA SLIDING TOWARD DICTATORSHIP?

Not since Ronald Reagan was President has Russia laid down the gauntlet as did Vladamir Putin this morning during a meeting with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Defense William Gates in Moscow. To begin with he made them wait 40 minutes before he arrived!
Mr. Putin, who earlier this month announced that he would renege on his promise to step down at the end of his term as President, and run as Prime Minister of Russia. Threatened the American delegation that if the United States continued it's plans to establish an anti-missile base in Poland and a radar tracking station in the Chech Republic. Russia would strongly consider pulling out of the intermediate range missile treaty signed in 1987 during the cold war by The Soviet Union and President Reagan.
Putin an ex-KGB agent Colonel, and his FSB Colonel General Sergei Ivanov were part of a four man group including Putin, that met in Putin's Dacha in rural Moscow. The other notables who were in attendance were Sergy Lavrov and Anatoly Serdyukov. Government appointees of Putin's inner circle of Power.
Of note is the fact that Mr. Ivanov is former Federal Couter Intelligence Service member (FSK). This Service replaced the KGB after the supposed demise of the Soviet Union. In 2004 it was changed to the FSB. Over 78% percent of the top 1000 political figures under Putin are estimated to be ex-FSB members. It is noteworthy to mention that Putin himself said there are no ex-KGB members that are alive.
Does the threat laid before our Secretary of State indicate the resurgence of the cold war? I believe so. I don't believe it ever ended. It just "went to Ground".
The Russian billion dollar deal to build a nuclear power plant in Iran was one of the actions taken by Putin that should have signaled the power grab in the back of Putin's mind.
With over 8% of Russia's taxes coming from Gasprom, the big gorilla of natural gas and petroleum in Europe. Putin has available to him the money needed to ramp up his military and re- institute the cold war against the U.S. with the willing accomplices of the Iranians and other American hating Arab Countries.
To fully grasp the devious nature of the suave ,urbane looking Putin you have to understand that many informed people believe that Putin has been, undercover of media silence, gradually establishing his control over Russia with an iron fist approach.
Not the least of the actions that are believed to have been caused by his direction are the recent murder of a female Journalist and an ex-KGB agent who had said or written unfavorable things about Putin and his Government.
If Putin wants to re-establish a dictatorial type of control over Russia he will need to convince the Russians that his being Prime Minister over a "figure head" President. He must assure that there will be no obvious dissent.
Even though Russia was already a hostile place for political dissent. Putin's first convenient event that helped stifle opponents, was the killing of Journalist Anna Politkoskaya in her apartment by gun shots.

Then the suspicious death of Alexander Litvinenko, a former KGB officer, and outspoken opponent of the FSB is the most recent example.

Litvinenko was writing a book about the FSB’s abuses (including high-profile assassinations) during the Putin era and allegedly had been gathering information on the FSB’s involvement Politkovskaya’s death. Litvinenko died of a mysterious case of polonium-210 radiation poisoning on 23 November 2006. He was apparently infected during a meeting with a contact a month earlier.

So the Doves in the United States should wake up to the threats that are all around us and within our Country. Their dissent will not be tolerated if we loose this war!

CRITICS THINK PATRIOT ACT IS BAD!

In this Country we have the Patriot Act to locate terrorists and terrorist sympathisers who aid them with money and spying. The majority of Americans realize we are in the midst of a war with Islamist extremists, and accept the Patriot Act for what it is. A line of defense against an enemy dedicated to the eradication of our way of life.
Unfortunately their are many groups who would rather "be free than safe", as was expressed by the statement of ACLU representative, Cindy Whitfield.
Her organization had filed by 2003, 24 lawsuits against the Patriot Act , including one for the CAIR instituted suit against an American airline for violation of the civil rights of disruptive Muslim Imams.
The ACLU has spent millions of dollars on the advertising campaign against the Patriot Act . The effort is called "keep America Safe and Free".

These "quasi-patriotic" groups and organizations try to appear concerned for the rights of the "little guy", but are in fact trying to destroy the rule of law. Too many members and leaders of the ACLU are neo-Communists who are dedicated to the destruction of our way of life, and substituting their Utopian ideals of Marxist socialism.
The ACLU was formed in 1920 by an attorney, Roger Baldwin who had served nine months in jail for refusing to be drafted in WWI, and a feminist who founded the New York branch of the Women's Peace Party. The ACLU members at the beginning were previous members of the National Civil Liberties Bureau. Many were immigrant Marxists and Anarchists.
The ACLU has defended the right of the Klu Klux Klan to hold rallies, and a famous case upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, they defended Yetta Stromberg vs. The people of the State of California. This case was brought about because Yetta had a Communist Youth Camp in California that flew the Red Communist flag and not the Stars and Stripes.
During WWI President Wilson said: "The authority to exercise censorship is absolutely necessary to the Public safety", and Teddy Roosevelt once said: "anti-war advocates are the enemies at home".

The ACLU and all the other Iraq War protesters like the "She Witch" Cindy Sheehan, should look to Russia where their speech and actions would certainly get them killed or jailed!
The "better red than dead" crowd should read the article printed in the Front Page Magazine on line, that details a forum held to discuss the death of Anna Polikovskaya, shot in her apartment in Moscow 10/7/06, and the murder in Great Britain of former Lt. Col. Alexxander Litvinenko of the Russian Secret Service(formerly KGB) 11/1/06.
The following is an excerpt from a participant, Vladimir Bukovsky. A man who as a Soviet dissident, had spent 12 years in Soviet prison camps, when asked to comment on the deaths of The Journalist Anna and the ex-RFFSS agent, had this to say.
"Consider this: in July of this year, the Russian Duma passed a law authorizing the Russian President to use secret services as "death squads" in order to eliminate "extremists" -- even on the foreign territory (Federal Law of 27 July 2006 N 153-F3).

At the same time, the Duma amended another law, expanding the definition of "extremism" to include anyone "libellously" critical of the current Russian regime (Federal Law of 27 July 2006 N 148-F3).

A stage is set for any critic of Putin's regime here, especially those campaigning against Russian genocide in Chechnya, to have an appointment with a poison-tipped umbrella. According to the statement by the RF Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov, the black list of potential targets is already composed."
And Critics of the Patriot Act think they have it bad?

ALLIANCE BETWEEN ISLAMISTS AND COMMUNISTS?

For a very long time I have pondered why the French, Russian and Chinese repeatedly vote against resolutions, proposed in he UN by the United States, to restrict the continued march for nuclear weapons in Iran and other Countries anything but friendly to the U.S.

One would think that the French, Russians and Chinese would see the threat of nuclear proliferation, and vote with us. But the case can be made that by their veto power in the UN, they have aided and abetted the radical Islamists in their quest to gain enough power to destroy not only Israel but the United States as well.

I have finally come to the conclusion that it is because of the inculcated hatred for Americans success in the world of economics, and military might that the "neo-communists have looked to the radical Muslims to do their dirty work for them.

Since the days of Marx and Lenin and continuing in great force during the days of Stalin and Kruscheff. Communists have hated the freedom and success of the United States.

When Joseph Stalin said: We don't have to defeat you by force . We will defeat you from within." He was already setting up his world wide spy network, including the Capitols of Europe and America. History shows all the major European countries and America have discovered spies in high places in government, and we will never know how many are still operating.

These Communists have developed through propaganda, disinformation and lies a long list of followers all over the world. Their mission is to bring down our government what ever way they can, so they can replace it with Godless Communism. Communism that has a place for the neo-Communists in the upper eschelon of life, as we learned they had, even during the days of Stalin in the USSR.

Unfortunately Our State Department, Academia and the Media, to name but a few of the spheres of influence here in the U.S, have neo-Communists within them. These are referred to as Left-Wingers, but the true neo-Communist is one who hates the Capitalist system, and desperately wants to change it to Marxist Socialism. A failed idea, but they fervently believe they can do it right this time!

This is the reason the Russians under ex?-KGB officer, Putin and most of Europe's leadership has gone soft on the war against Islamic-fascism.

They want the U.S. brought to its knees, and they are using the radical Muslim world in their fight against the U.S.

Weapons from Russia and China. Technology from France and a pro-Communist press in Great Britain have been helping the Islamists since the "Food for OIL" scandal broke.

The following is a quote from the "American Thinker" written by Jame Lewis:

"The ideological goals of NeoCommunism have not changed one bit, which is why the term "communism" is so accurate. The sucker goal is to create Paradise on Earth by overthrowing democratic capitalism. The real goal is to enable the rise of a new ruling class with huge power over ordinary people. One reason that NeoCommunists have so much in common with Islamic Fascists is that both fantasize about the same millenarian end: Islamists also hate democratic capitalism, and they also want to take over the world for a purer, more idealistic tyranny. Check out Saudi Arabia and Iran for some good examples.
After the fall of the Soviet Empire, the Left changed tactics but not goals. In Europe the result was called the "Third Way," and it is the controlling ideology of the European Union today. The "Third Way" claims to be a compromise between capitalism and Communism, but it comes down to sucking resources from relatively free markets for the sake of centralized State power and control. EU propaganda is just recycled socialist propaganda. You can easily see it on the web.
It is no accident that the United Kingdom today is surrendering its national sovereignty to the European Union as fast as possible: The socialist ruling classes in the UK know they will merge seamlessly into the EU elites, at higher salaries, bigger perks, and much more power. The UK elites are simply planning to join the new ruling class of the emerging European Empire. It's a promotion they just can't turn down.
Down the road it's quite possible that the EU will turn Hard Left, and junk soft socialism. And it's not impossible that it will turn Hard Right, like the Nazis. It all depends on circumstances. In France, Dominique de Villepin certainly celebrates a Napoleonic Empire for the future, as he makes clear in his writings.
The most ambitious aim of the European Union, one that is not disguised, is to become part of a world government, a far more powerful United Nations perhaps, to unify control over the world. They are real enemies of Capitalism.
America has real enemies today. They are totalitarians who shout to the world that they are bound and determined to bring us Paradise on Earth -- as long as it's under their collective thumb. It doesn't really matter whether they are Islamists or Stalinist. They are not hard to figure out, since they proclaim their message from the rooftops. It is an ancient disease flaring up again.
Americans and other civilized countries have a record of winning out over tyrannical ideologies, at least over the longer term. But winning is by no means guaranteed. It's like a Twelve-Step Program -- first you have to recognize that the disease has gone too far. Then you can do something about it --- gently, factually, and in a persuasive way.
Winning against Neo-Communism is a matter of reaching hearts and minds, as it always is. Yes, you can love the sinners, just don't fool yourself about the sin. It all starts with telling the truth that is right in front of our eyes".

It says it all, and it is not as some critics will say, acute paranoia. It is the facts as seen today.

TAX PAYERS BEWARE OF HILLARY

Just when I thought Hillary Clinton had offered the American voters enough "goodies" to convince even the biggest sceptic that she is a hard core Socialist. She went and offered more free stuff that would have to be financed by the taxpayers who are already taxed heavily.

Today she promised, if elected President, she would establish 401 K plans for everybody! The following is aquote from The Hillary Project.

"Every citizen could get a 401(k) retirement account and up to $1,000 in annual matching funds from the government under a plan offered Tuesday by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.
At a cost of $20 billion-$25 billion a year, the plan is Clinton's largest domestic proposal other than her plan for universal health insurance.
The New York senator said it would be paid for by taxing estates worth more than $7 million per couple and would help narrow the gap between the rich and those who don't have enough savings for retirement.
At the same time, Clinton said she has given up another idea for a savings incentive—giving every baby born in the United States a $5,000 account to one day pay for college or a first home.
She made that suggestion last month before the Congressional Black Caucus, saying it was just an idea and not a policy proposal. The idea was criticized by Republicans, and she told The Wall Street Journal in an interview published Tuesday that it's off the table.
The campaign of her Democratic rival John Edwards suggested it was an example of Clinton setting her positions by polls. "Apparently, new polling data seems to have pressured the Clinton campaign to throw out the baby bond with the bathwater," said Edwards spokesman."

If Americans could see through the lies and false promises that Senator Clinton is spewing. They would realize that there is not enough money received by the Federal Government from the high earners to fund this plan. I believe it would not get through Congress, but it illustrates the lengths that this Socialist will go to to capture her prize--the White House!

If she gets elected every wage earner will pay the price for her Socialistic ideals!

DUPLICITY TRUMPS ETHICS IN DEATH PENALTY OPPOSITION

As Reported in JURIST, A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Tennessee's execution procedures constitute "cruel and unusual" punishment, derailing plans to execute a death row inmate next week. US District Judge Aleta Trauger [official profile] held that revised death penalty protocols [PDF text; JURIST report], devised by the Tennessee Department of Corrections in April at the request of Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen [official website], do not ensure that prisoners' are properly anesthetized before they receive a lethal injection and thus violate their constitutional Eighth Amendment rights. The Tennessee Attorney Generals office has not yet decided whether or not it will appeal the decision. This coincides with an article written by a British Neurologist for the JURIST, Dr. David Nocholl, demanding that death penalty cases that are carried out using lethal injection are cruel and unusual treatment because the chemicals used could allow the person being put to death to feel pain
Putting aside for a moment the fact that the person being put to death had no concern for the person he/she killed in a heinous manner felt pain.
There is a unfathomable hypocrisy in advocating the end to capital punishment based upon the pain it causes, while thousands of doctors inflict pain on unborn and partially born babies every day during abortions.
In the period from 1976 to 2000 there were just 64 executions in the State of Florida, but records show that in 2003 alone there were 854,122 abortions performed in the U.S.
Twenty-five percent of those women who had abortions gave the reason for the abortions as: "they wanted to postpone childbearing", and only 2.8% were because the mothers life or health was endangered by the pregnancy.
Over 12% of the abortions performed in the U.S. are done after 13 weeks post fertilization.
Available scientific evidence indicates that a fetus can feel pain 20 weeks after fertilization, and they certainly feel it when partial birth abortions are performed on fully formed babies. The source for this statistic is a Time Magazine article written in December 2006 by Nancy Gibbs.


Dr. Nicholls had this to say about the chemicals used in lethal injection:

"There is no clear medical reason for the use of the muscle-paralysing agent, Pancuronium, as there is the very real possibility of a prisoner who is paralysed but only partially anesthetized will experience intense pain with the cardiotoxin, Potassium Chloride. However, for death penalty proponents, clearly it would be disturbing to see a prisoner writhing in pain, so the use of Pancuronium would be a politically astute move. It is interesting to note how even the US veterinary association regard the use of Pancuronium unacceptable in the euthanasia of domestic pets. Today’s report clearly shows a number of cases where executions have been botched with prolonged deaths, skins burns and convulsions. Why do doctors involve themselves in the death penalty, when every medical association that has studied the matter, has so conclusively opposed the involvement of health care workers in the death penalty? Often there is ignorance of ethical guidelines amongst members of the medical profession"
It is equally interesting to this blogger that the doctor refers to pain inflicted on a dog and ignores the pain inflicted on millions of aborted babies!
Abortion hurts - - physically, psychologically,and spiritually. A recent column that appeared in an issue of the magazine "George". Written by Naomi Wolf, it was titled "The Dead Baby Boom." In a few words her thesis is that partial-birth abortions are so painful to contemplate that "the image pushing to the forefront of our culture is that of a tortured fetus outside the womb." Whether the victim is a newborn or an infant, these are "suffering babies". Why are people like Dr.Nicholland the Tennessee District Judge Trauger not more interested in the pain inflicted daily not occasionally in the dastardly abortion process. I think it is all about money!

hypocracy

hypocracy

hypocracy

hypocracy

hypocracy

WAS THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUION A MISTAKE?

Since 12/15/1791, when the State of Virginia ratified the Bill Of Rights ,that contained the first ten Amendments to the original Constitution signed in 1787. The first amendment has been twisted every way imaginable to allow the exclusion of religious symbols from public places.

It has also been used by Liberal activists to aid and abet flag burning,hard-core rap, heavy-metal lyrics, tobacco advertising, hate speech(used against the President often), pornography, nude dancing, solicitation and various forms of symbolic speech.

Is it time to consider separating hate speech and outright lying in publications outside the purview of the protection given by the First Amendment? Many would agree to limiting some forms of free expression, as seen in the First Amendment Center's State of the First Amendment survey reports.

The recent Washington State Supreme Court decision concerning the First Amendment right to lie in advertisements about political opponents, is a perfect example of the stretch that Liberal Activists have taken the First Amendment to mean.

By a narrow 5-4 decision the Washington State Supreme Court struck down the Washington State Law that forbids lying about one's opponent in political adds.

We all know politics produces lies, and most politicians tell lies. It is part of their make-up to lie about what they will do if elected, but to try to defame an opponent by telling or printing lies about him/her is a new low in political campaigns that will only get worse with Court rulings like the Washington case.

A recent poll by The First Amendment Center revealed that 60% of those surveyed believed the press reported the news with a political bias. This is a reflection of the fact that well over 95% of Journalists vote Democratic.

The same poll showed an increasing number of people believe the press has too much freedom to print what they want. The 34% who believe this is the case is considerably less than a poll taken in 2000 when over 51% believed the press had too much freedom to print what they wanted. This is probably a backlash from the controversy surrounding the 2000 Presidential election.

"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise"-- Adolf Hitler

Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler were masters at propaganda, and ruled their press with an iron hand. Today the Liberals are using the press and the academic institutions to promote their secular, humanistic form of Marxist Socialism not unlike Adolf and Joe did in their reign of terror.

God willing, the Liberals won't be successful in their brain washing techniques using the First Amendment to hide behind. But I wouldn't bet on it.

THE FOLLOWING IS A QUOTE FROM AN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY RANDALL HOVE IN AMERICAN THINKER:

"Did you know that Time magazine and other news organizations had a Vietnamese communist on full-time staff in Vietnam during that war? Do you remember that ABC, CBS and NBC have all rigged cars or trucks with explosives or other devices to make them look dangerous on TV, or that Consumer Reports lied about the Suzuki Samurai enough to put it out of business? Do you know that multiple "veterans" of the Viet Nam and Iraq wars who told of atrocities there were never even in the military? Did you realize reputable news organizations such as the Boston Globe and Reuters cannot tell the difference between a real soldier and a toy doll, commercial pornography and soldiers committing rape, a burning tire dump and a bombed building, a fired and an unfired rifle round, or footage of the North Pole and a clip from the movie Titanic?
When it comes to President Bush, the media have lied about his National Guard service, lied about his serving a plastic turkey to troops in Iraq on Thanksgiving and then made a big deal about that phony story, lied about his speeches, quoted him by removing the words he actually used, and admitted they would use a harsher standard with him than his opponent John Kerry. To this day, they criticize his administration's handling of the Katrina crisis, which was actually one of the most successful rescue and recovery efforts in history, but barely mention their own huge and egregious mistakes in reporting on that event."

A VETERANS REACTION TO OBAMA

SO BARRACK OBAMA FEELS IT IS FALSE PATRIOTISM TO WEAR A FLAG PIN ON HIS LAPEL.

This Candidate for President feels he would rather explain how he feels he can make America a better Country than to wear the symbol of this Country on his suit coat lapel.

I believe this is a demonstration of his lame attempt to court anti-war voters away from Senator Clinton, and shows a distinct lack of appreciation for all those men and women who fought and died for the right to display that flag in a free Country.

Everyone should know that the caskets of every brave hero who died for this Country is covered by the American flag before the burial takes place. Soldier, Sailors, Marines, Air Force, Cost Guard, Fireman and Policeman who die in the line of duty have a flag covering their casket which is given to a member of the family at the grave site in honor of their brave and appreciated sacrifice.

Now this "johnny come lately" comes along asking the American people to make him their President. I think not!

No matter what his upbringing includes. He should have an allegiance to the Flag for which we fight and die for. To put his opinions on how to run this Country on the same level as the American flag is the heights of pomposity.

Most of his ideas as expressed on the campaign trail are Socialist, not American values, so I guess I should not be surprised that he refuses to wear the flag pin proudly.

If he won't wear the flag pin for the war effort. He should wear it as a testimonial to the bravery and sacrifice of the Police and Fireman who died in the 9/11 attack by Al Qaeda in New York!

This man may be showing the affects of his Muslim training as a youth or the anti-American preaching of his Black Separatist Ministers preaching in his Chicago home town. No one will ever know what is deep in his mind, but I know one thing. He has no business running for President of the United States if he is not willing to wear a flag pin on his lapel. I hope every veteran, no matter what color of his skin, realizes the apparent affront he demonstrates to their service to Our Country, and to the flag that they all wore proudly on their shoulder patch.

SOME DEMOCRATS ARE NOTHING BUT ATTACK DOGS

Please pray for our Patriot Armed Forces standing in harm’s way around the world, and for their families, especially those of our fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who have died in defense of American liberty while prosecuting the war with Jihadistan.

With the leftist in Congress and the PresS trying everything they can including supporting lies and character assassination to get the U.S. out of Iraq. The boys and women in uniform in "theater of war" need all our prayers.

The latest attempt to destroy the confidence in American people is the dastardly attack on Rush Limbaugh by Senate Democrat leader Reid(aka hatchet man) and Senator Harkin. Their letter to Clear Channel to remove Rush from the AIR is just another lame attempt to silence a Conservative voice that is heard by over 50 million people every day.

Rush had the courage to "call out" a lying 44 day "washout" at Fort Benning Georgia, a "phony soldier". This man, and I use the word loosely, publicly claimed he was a recipient of the purple heart who served in Iraq as a Ranger , and had witnessed many killings and tortures of Iraqi civilians by the U.S. Rangers.

There is a special place in Hell reserved for people like this lying hypocrite, Jessie MacBeth, but they will have to wait at least until this bum serves his time in jail for falsifying a VA claim an his discharge papers.

This reminds me and I am sure millions of other Americans of the lies told by failed Presidential candidate and present member of the Senate, John Kerry.

The Deamoncrats appear to believe that if you can't defeat a man in the area of public ideas and discourse like Limbaugh, you try to "kill" him. Not literally but by removing his influential voice from radio, so Americans no longer can hear his Conservative views.

I don't listen to Rush because of my busy life style, but in the years that I was on the road a lot I often tuned in his show, and I found it amusing and informative.

Informative is the operative word in Rush's case. Hateful people as I consider most Democrats in Congress don't want the American people to hear the truth. They want to spoon feed US their version of the truth, and too often it is a lie!

The following is a quote from the Seattle Post Intellagencer: "A complaint unsealed Friday in U.S. District Court in Seattle charged him with one count of using or possessing a forged or altered military discharge certificate, and one count of making false statements in seeking benefits from the Veterans Administration…
…Macbeth claimed to have been shot in Iraq and to have suffered post-traumatic stress disorder, LaMont E. Stokes, an agent with the VA’s Office of the Inspector General, wrote in the charging papers. He collected more than $10,400 in benefits to which he was not entitled, Stokes wrote.
Stokes said he interviewed Macbeth in the Pierce County Jail in Tacoma, where he has been serving a sentence for fourth-degree assault, and that Macbeth admitted falsifying the documents because he was homeless and wanted to “sucker” anything he could out of the government."

Enough of the lies Senator Harkin and Reid!

TIME TO CHANGE POLITICAL PARTY NAMES?

"Democrat politicians—just as all of our enemies from without and within—have now become overtly anti-American. As an example, not one of the current Democrat presidential candidates has condemned the MoveOn.org Ad. With their silence, Democrat leaders are tacitly approving of MoveOn.orgs’s character assassination of General Petraeus—the same General that they had applauded and recommended fir the task just months ago. To Democrats, General Petraeus’ success has bred contempt within, apparently, all of them.
Leaders of the Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy and Zell Miller mold are no longer allowed in the increasingly fanatical Democrat Party. It is now firmly (with no hope of changing back to any semblance of normalcy) become the US political party of socialists, communists, radicals of various persuasions and even Islamist terrorists. As an example, on 7 September Al-Qaeda terrorist leader Osama bin-Laden criticized Democrats for not doing more to stop the Iraq war so that they [al-Qaeda] could take over that country. In 2006, bin-Laden urged—even threatened—American to vote for Democrats."

The following is a quote from the Socialist Party of America: "Militarism also concentrates even greater power in the hands of the few, the powerful and the violent. We align with no nation, but only with working people throughout the world." Sounds stragly similar to the sentiments of the Democrat leadership!

This preceding quote is taken from "The New Media Journal U.S.", and it illustrates a n accurate reason why it may be time for Americans to Abandon the old Party names Democrat and Republican and now call them either Conservatives or Socialists!

The front runner for the Democrat nominee for President talks like a Socialist with her radical feminist views and plan to socialize our medical care. The other Democrats and too many "RINOS" in the Republican party, consistently vote for more and more government. They should be part of the new Socialist party as well as the Demoncrats of today.

The days of Kennedy and Zell Miller Democrats have long gone and they are replaced by the "it takes a village" feminists , anti-religion secularists, political correct freaks , environmental (aka old Communists) controllers, and anti- military get out of Iraq ilk.

The following quote is another excerpt from the Socialist Party of America web page: " Socialism is not mere government ownership, a welfare state, or a repressive bureaucracy. Socialism is a new social and economic order in which workers and consumers control production and community residents control their neighborhoods, homes, and schools. The production of Society is used for the benefit of all humanity, not for the private profit of a few. Socialism produces a constantly renewed future by not plundering the resources of the earth." Sounds pretty much like what Obama and Hillary and her challengers in the Democrat primaries are saying on the campaign trail.

We have to stop deluding ourselves that there is a common ground that can be reached between those who control the Democrat Party and the Conservatives of the United States. There is an ideological war going on, and the there can be no option to surrender!

We are in a battle for the very survival of the Republic that our Founding Fathers left to us. Most of the control, if not all, has been taken over in the Democrat Party by the George Soros funded Move On.org group. If you don't believe me, here is aquote from Eli Pariser of MoveOn.org in 2004 at the Democrat Convention: "Now it is our Party. We bought it, we own it, and we’re going to take it back!”

They have the money and they call the shots, and they are not pushing Democratic reforms. They want an International Socialist system of Government similar to what you would find in Europe. That way the "One World" proponents will accomplish their goals, which are similar to the goals of The Socialist Workers party.

The National Health Scam

As has been the case for the past sixty years or more, the welfare state that President Roosevelt( I never Knew a Russian I didn't like)started, has been expanding while redistributing the wealth from the earners to the non-earners.
The latest version of the Democrat give away plan for votes involves the subject of health Care Coverage for all. By some strange miraculous occurrence, health care has become in the minds of too many Americans a Constitutional if not God given right. To garner more votes and continue the secular socialization of the United States the main plank other than the partially broken one about troop withdrawal from Iraq, is Universal Health Care,and it is just another scam!
The following quote from the Heritage Foundation should shed some light on the latest socialized proposal.
"According to the federal government, thousands of American families are both poor and high-income—simultaneously. These families are considered poor enough to be eligible for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) program, but under the tax code, they are considered wealthy and so forced to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Their ranks may grow if Congress moves forward with plans to expand SCHIP eligibility to wealthier families. The unlikely convergence of these two programs shows how the best intentions of Congress can go astray and result in conflicting priorities. Instead of making this problem worse by expanding SCHIP, Congress should keep SCHIP focused on low-income families and extend the "hold harmless" provision of the AMT" .
SCHIP is a government-funded health insurance originally designed to cover low-income children. Now, however, Democrats want to expand the role of the central government and the size of the SCHIP program dramatically. For instance, they want to increase the income level of those eligible from poverty rates ($16,000 annual income for a family of three, $20,000 for a family of four) to more than double their current levels. Under the Democrat proposal, many families making as much as $80,000 a year would be eligible for this subsidy, meaning that even if they currently have and are able to pay for private health care insurance, they could transfer their coverage to the SCHIP program and essentially have the American taxpayers pay for their health insurance, even though they are well able to themselves.
If this isn't Socialism I am a Martian. Do Most Americans want to go down that path? All you have to do is look at the mess caused by Socialism in Germany, France and England to realize that a free enterprise democratic society like ours is intended to be is the only way to prosper. Yes, we must provide health care for the lame, the blind and the halt as well as the really poor. But we don't have to provide health care coverage to people whose wants are confused with their needs! Too many people want cigarettes and liquor and all other pleasurable wants including that second car, but have no money left to pay for insurance. Must we provide it to those whose ability to pay is compromised by their screwed up priorities? I think not!

DEMOCRATS SURPASS EVERYONE IN SLEEZE

The latest reports on campaign contributions show the Democrats are taking in more money for their election campaign than the Republicans, but these reports don't usually mention who they are from.
Recent history has shown that not only billionaires like George Soros and Warren Buffett, and millionaires in Hollywood, but not often reported is the $100,000 contributions from the "seamy side" of life.
James Ready, Hong Kong long time associate of the Clintons, $100,000 gift to James McDougal shortly after visiting the Clinton White House in August of 1994, the large cah donation from the Pau family of Daley City, Ca,(a shop keeper), the $850,000 that Hillary had to give back to federal indicted Mr.Norman Hsu, and the 1.2 million dollars Hillary received from a Hollywood Gala in 2000. This "gala" fundraiser for Hillary's Senate campaign is part of a lawsuit filed by the organizer and person who paid for this event, Peter Franklin Paul(convicted felon who was released from federal prison in 1985) for $17 million dollars. His suit alleges the Clinton's defrauded him, and there are charges that the junior Senator from New York committed felonies related to this Hollywood fund raising event. This case is in the hands of a judge appointed by Democratic ex-Governor Gray Davis, so don't expect a ruling or any action until after the 2008 election.
If these are mentioned or printed, they are referred to as attempts by right wing radicals out to hurt the Clinton's. Much like the Whitewater scandal that occupied the Courts and special prosecutor from 1979 to 1997.
In the years of Whitewater, a poll showed that 60% of Americans believed the Clintons were hiding something! I am sure of it!

SUPREME COURT STRIKES BLOW FOR SECULARISM

Today the supreme court struck a blow against organized religious organizations(especially Catholics),by failing to hear the case brought by opponents of a New York lower court ruling that religious organizations must include birth control coverage in their medical insurance for employees.
The Founding Fathers deliberately avoided establishing a national Religion, but would be appalled at the idea that Government could dictate to a religious organization that they must violate their beliefs to supply a benefit to employees that is decided by Government not the Religious group that by the way is also paying for the benefit.

While the Supreme Court is attacking the Constitutional rights of Church organizations. The attack on The basic principals upon which this once great Country was founded continues on the local level.
A decision by a school district in southern Illinois has decide to eliminate the celebrations of Christmas and Halloween in four grade schools and a junior high because of a complaint lodged by a Muslim mother. The school district has a 30% Arab population.
Christmas and Easter are sacred days to all Christians. The elimination of Christmas, and replacing it with a "winter fest" is a disgrace. It is a blow against the majority population in the United States, and a perfect example of the slide to the atheist-anti-religion stance of the secular left in America.

1938 Revisited by Hillary Clinton?

As if promising socialized medicine wasn't enough to garner the votes of the woman voters. Senator Clinton has "switched to the other side of the plate", and appears to be encouraging motherhood not abortion. In a speech yesterday she said she thought the government should give every child who is born a $5,000 Bond, redeemable at age 18 with an unspecified interest rate.
Not since the days of Adolph Hitler leading up to WWII has there been such a political incentive for motherhood. Hitler took a different approach, awarding medals to women who had over four children.
The following is an excerpt from an article published by Charles Sturt University on the web, about the Nazi attempt to encourage more children be born to fight for the "Fatherland".
"A motherhood cult was put in place. On the 12 August (the birthday of Hitler's mother) fertile mothers were awarded the Honour Cross of the German Mother (bronze for more than four children, silver for more than six, gold for more than eight). Prolific mothers were honoured the same as front line troops. A wartime slogan says it all, "I have donated a child to the Führer ".
Don't leap to the conclusion that I am comparing Senator Clinton to Hitler, but there is an analogy here that strikes to the heart of her quest for the White House,
Clinton has proposed many things, none of which she has told us how they will be paid for, except by trashing the Bush tax cuts and more taxes on the "rich". All of this smacks of Socialism, and the dictatorship of Hitler was a form of Socialism. Often referred to as Fascism. The dictatorship of Hitler was a tyrannical autocracy with unlimited rule over all German people. Not all Germans were members of the Nazi party,
The situation in the United States is gradually moving in that direction, with the erosion of individual rights for the benefit of Society as a whole. The two party system is gradually moving to a one purpose group. To develop a larger government that rules our lives and provides what it believes is best for the Common Good, not what individuals would prefer.And certainly, not what our Founding Fathers had in mind when they drew up the Constitution for a limited Federal Government.

TIME TO LOOK TO THOSE WHO LIVED THE COMMUNIST EXPERIENCE

It has become apparent to this blogger that every one of the Democrat candidates for President wants to lead America down the path to Socialism. They are supported by a leftist media, the intelligentsia who believe the rest of us are to uneducated or to enlightened to determine our own fate. So they want us to be lead by promises to give more government handouts to the "under class" of the U.S. by taking it away from those who earn it.

The web site Patriot Post reveals the fact that previously Communist controls have been successful running their governments by cutting taxes and allowing free enterprise to rule the day.

The following is an excerpt from today's Patriot Post.

"Speaking of taxes, a recent Investor’s Business Daily editorial highlights a growing trend in Eastern Europe’s ex-communist nations: the low-rate flat tax. In the U.S., when a politician argues for lower taxes, the result is a drawn-out ideological debate. In Eastern Europe, such debates are unheard of. It’s simply assumed common knowledge that low, non-progressive tax rates are better for everybody (even for government revenues). There is good reason for this assumption: Formerly stagnant economies are flourishing and government revenues are increasing, even as tax rates are going down—flat-tax rates between ten and 20 percent are common, and rates are declining. The “Baltic Tigers” of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania are perfect examples of economic growth, as they embrace the principles of a free economy and just tax laws. Apparently, it takes several years under an oppressive Marxist regime to give a nation a real taste for economic freedom.
Their only mistake is to think that after their break with communism, they are now imitating the West. In reality, they are leading the way. Old Europe continues to commit economic suicide by attempting to preserve bloated welfare states, and even the United States could do worse than to heed the lesson of the Baltic Tigers. The specifics of the “flat tax” are not the point. The proposed “fair tax” would likely work just as well. As ironic as it may sound, we would do well to follow the example of Eastern Europe, rather than follow Western Europe’s socialist road to serfdom".

Based upon this information only those who want the Government to take care of them from cradle to grave should vote for a Democrat in 2008.

DEMOCRATS STOOP TO GUTTER POLITICS

Not since the Presidential campaign of 1964 when Johnson and Humphrey ran against Barry Goldwater have I seen the Democrats stoop so low into the gutter in the quest for power.
For those of you who don't remember or were not alive in 1964. I will briefly review the add that ran only one time on National television by the Democrat election committee.It ran immediately before the election.
A little girl of six years age or thereabout, was seen in the first frames of the add picking daisy's. In an instant she was blown to smithereens by an apparent atom bomb. The add concluded with words to the effect that if Goldwater was elected this would happen! Johnson won in a walk!
Today we have a new low in political advertising lead by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee that includes such ilk as Congressman Ram Emanuel and Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives. The Chairman at this time is Congressman Chris Van Hollan of Maryland.
The following is a report by a columnist at CNSNEWS.Com.

Susan JonesCNSNews.com Senior EditorSeptember 28, 2007(CNSNews.com) - "As the end of September approaches, so does the end of the third fund-raising quarter, prompting urgent last-minute appeals from political and advocacy groups that use key phrases such as "Karl Rove" and "Islamophobia" to drive liberal outrage -- and attract dollars. One Democratic group(DCCC) on Thursday sent out a fundraising appeal "signed" by Karl Rove.
Obsessed by Rove, although Bush adviser Karl Rove left the White House this summer, Democrats are still using his name to raise funds".
The letter sent out contained these words: "As my last act in the White House, I asked Dick Cheney if he could help me break into the DCCC and send you this email," "Rove" says in a "parody" issued by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee on Thursday.The DCCC, a group that raises money to elect Democrats to the House, has "Rove" reminiscing about alleged misdeeds of the Bush White House: "For six years the Republicans in Congress let George [Bush], Dick [Cheney] and me get away with every trick in the book. Making up stuff about weapons of mass destruction, revealing the identity of a covert agent to get revenge on her husband, firing US Attorneys who went after Republicans; we did it all. And if Republicans were in power we'd still be getting away with it."Then "Rove" says, "On behalf of Dick Cheney, I order you not to contribute to the DCCC."The message, intended to prompt Democrats to open their wallets, is signed, "Insincerely, Karl Rove," and it's followed by a "P.S." noting that although the message is a parody, "the sentiment is real: don't let Karl and his friends go back on the offensive."
When a party lacks any positive platform other than surrender in Iraq and Socialized Medicine with more taxes for all, and more welfare programs for illegals. I guess they are driven into the gutter of character assassination as is this case.
Moveon.org, funded by billionaire George Soros, still smarting over congressional repudiation of its "General Betray Us" ad, MoveOn.org says that Congress -- by failing to force an immediate troop withdrawal -- is not doing its job.
The new project invites Americans to send photos of themselves showing "how you feel about the war." Photo submitters also will be invited to record a voice message to Congress, and MoveOn.org Political Action says it will "put together a big unveiling," using the photos and words in an ad campaign and in a message to members of Congress. "We'll make it impossible for them to ignore you," the group promised. It is obvious that Moveon.org has committed themselves to a troop pullout. They have also stepped up their negative campaign against OUR Country's War effort against Islamic radicalism. The following is an except from a press release of Moveon.org. Still smarting over congressional repudiation of its "General Betray Us" ad, MoveOn.org says that Congress --" by failing to force an immediate troop withdrawal -- is not doing its job". The new project invites Americans to send photos of themselves showing "how you feel about the war." Photo submitters also will be invited to record a voice message to Congress, and MoveOn.org Political Action says it will "put together a big unveiling," using the photos and words in an ad campaign and in a message to members of Congress. "We'll make it impossible for them to ignore you," the group promised".If one of the Democrat candidates running for the Presidential nomination wins the White House. MoveOn.org has not commented on the Democrats' refusal to commit themselves to a troop pullout. Despite this they have committed to a campaign which if done during WWII would have been considered treason!