Thursday, April 13, 2006

Will We turn to Law by Protest?

The recent past, and I am sure in the not too distant future we saw street "protests" for amnesty and voting rights for the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants now here in the United States. The "leftist" media and the politicians concerned with their own tenure in Congress all seem inclined to grant their demands.
It is understandable why the Democrats want these 12 million illegals to become legal by changing our immigration laws. Trashing them would be a more appropriate way to describe what they are doing.
But no matter how you describe their actions the end result is legislation driven by protest! Not a protest by and for the legal citizens of this country, but a protest by and for people who have broken the law which from the signs seen on television indicate they feel are unfair and by some, "RACIST"!
WHAT IF ALL LEGAL CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY AGE 20 TOOK THE STREETS to protest the unfair laws that prohibit drinking until they are 21.This arbitrary age discrimination is more onerous than the immigration laws that protect our borders. Even though an argument can be made that the present law is not enforceable, as demonstrated by the 12 million illegals currently in our Country. But the problem is not the law, but the lack of will to enforce the existing law. Proposed new immigration law will have even more provisions which will be next to impossible to enforce as long as this issue is a political "football".
One way we could reform our immigration law is to repeal or amend the law passed in 1965. This law ,sponsored by Senator Ted Kennedy, cut the percentage of European immigrants down to half what was allowed until this law passed, and raised the number of "Third World" immigrants to increase to 85% of the total legal immigrants allowed each year. What good would this do? History shows us that European immigrants with similar Judeo-Christian values assimilate quicker and a greater percentage find work quicker. They come here to make a life better for themselves and their families. Not to come to America to participate in our growing welfare state.
It goes with out saying that we must police our bordes better. Maybe even build a "wall", but we need to recognize one fact if no other in this debate. No other group has demanded and obtained bilingual education in our elementry schools, steets signs in Spanish and even ballots in their native tongue. If we are not vigilant, Mr. Kennedy and his friends will "Balkanize" our beloved counrty in the name of "fairness". Fairness to whom? That is what I want to know.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Europe First United States Next?

In the not too distant past we have seen the frightening images of riots in France and Holland by Muslims who emigrated to those counties. These riots have involved mass destruction of property and some loss of life. In Holland Mr. Van Gough was murdered by radicals who didn't like his writings. The Palestinians and Israelis have been "Warring" against each other for years, resulting in many murders and bombings.
All of this involving demands and guarantees by "outsiders" in all instances except the ongoing Israeli conflict. Europe is gradually becoming a cultural and political "appendage" of the Arab/Muslim world.
What has this got to do with our present situation in the United States? The corollary can be drawn with a comparison of what has happened in Europe because of unregulated immigration of Muslims, and what has begun here with the 11 or 12 million illegal aliens. Demands by people who have broken the law of the land by entering this country illegally, for our government to accept their demands for amnesty and eventual full citizen rights,including the right to vote.
There have been two "marches" by the "immigrants",which in the first March on our Nations Capital included representatives of CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations), ANSWER (act now to stop Racism. Free Palestine Alliance, American Solidarity Network,and the Nicaragua Network. All Leftist organizations that are for "open Borders and, if not anti-American are at least against the way of life as it presently exists in America. These were not all Hispanics hoping to become part of the American dream. Immigrants asking for help.
The demonstrations were nothing more than actions showing "naked power" in numbers while waving Mexican flags, burning American flags,and carrying derogatory posters about our President and Americans in general.
As could be expected the reaction from the majority of Americans was extremely negative. Next came "act two"! The PR people realized hey had to give the leftist media something to show the American people that wasn't so militant and anti_American. Thus,we had the marches again which were more like peaceful celebrations of holidays. Gone were the Mexican flags. Replaced by American flags and no more anti-posters! Be not fooled the first demonstrations held nationwide was the real problem we face here in its early stages. "Outsiders demanding their way with utter disregard for law and order.

Monday, April 10, 2006

Time to Change Political Party Names

It is no longer appropriate or descriptive to describe the political parties we have, as major players in national elections,as Democrats and Republicans. Point in fact,neither name describes the political and/or philosophical objectives of these two parties with their present names.I will demonstrate this below.
A more descriptive name for the two parties would be" Conservative" and "liberal". The liberals would come from either of the parties, since we presently have members of both houses of Congress who ran in "conservative" districts, but in fact vote more often as advocates of the liberal position on most issues than a Republican has been expected to vote. Democrats in today's Congress with few exceptions,primarily those from southern states, are advocates of "creeping" Socialism. A perfect example is the debate going on in Congress presently regarding illegal aliens. Primarily Hispanics from Mexico and Latin America. Although not openly admitting it the democrat's and a few Liberal Republicans advocate "Amnesty" for these twelve (12) million ilegals. They already have passed laws which guarantee that these people who have broken the law to enter our Country and have babies while here not only get delivery of the baby and all costs associated with it free. They also get a legal citizen as their new baby and eventual sponsor for their legal entrance to our County. No line to wait in like all law abiding immigrants. The list of social benefits are known to all. Food stamps,housing allowance assistance,Medicaid,and many more. This is the "welfare state" for ilegals. Once they get amnesty they will demand and march in the streets for one of our most precious birthrights. The right to vote. Do you think for an instant that the Liberals won't give it to them? The Democrats,more correctly called the Liberals, want more people dependent on the government. When this happens,all those government dependents will continue to vote for those in office who give them the "hand Out".Ther is an old saying. "You can't shoot Santa Claus!"
At the present rate of people being added to the roles of those dependent upon the government. It won't be long before there are more beholding to the government for some or all of there livelihood than there are those who work for themselves and rely on themselves for their existence. At this point we will have turned the corner from which there is no return short of dreaded revolution. United States will be another "third rate" socialist country.
This is the reason we need to realize now, not when it is too late, that we have two kinds of politicians. Liberals who are advocating socialistic programs, no matter how much their rhetoric disguises their actions, and those who want to stop the stampede towards socialism by putting forth Conservative programs. Don't let the leftist Media confuse you. The Liberals are debating for illegal alien amnesty, not for the "poor immigrants who have come here for a better life." These people are lawbreakers,and the Liberals in Congress not only want to legalize them, but encourage more of them to come help build their socialist base. Are you going to stand for this?