Amnesty Is aTravesty

To better understand how we have arrived at a time and place in this Country where WE apparently are about to open our borders wide to illegal immigrants. It is important to briefly review the history of immigration policy and law in the United States.
In 1790 Congress passed a law that excluded all but whites from becoming citizens.
This policy was changed after the Civil War when Congress passed a law making all freed slaves American citizens. This was followed in 1870 when Blacks were granted the right to vote, although women were still not able to vote!
In 1882 Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion act baring Asians from entering the Country. This law remained on the books until 1952 when the McCarran-Walter Act was passed. It lifted the barriers to citizenship for most immigrants from Asia.
In 1965 Congress passed an immigration bill which gave preference to immigrants who had special skills needed here in the U.S., and allowed close relatives of United States citizens to apply for citizenship. During this same year President Johnson sponsored a bill that repealed the quotas that were in place for immigrants by national origin.
Previous to 1965 the law stated that immigration by ethnic group would be limted to 3% of the current population of a particular ethnic group living in the U.S. This stipulation was included in the Immigration Act passed in 1921, and further restrictions were added in 1924.
In 1990 Immigration law was passed with preferences included for people who were fleeing from oppressive governments.
In the early years of our country the point of entry for all immigrants from Europe was Ellis Island. It was opened 1/1/1892 when three ships offloaded 700 people for processing. The total processed that year was 450,000 European Immigrants. By 1907 1,004,756 immigrants passed through immigration on Ellis Island.
Which brings us to Our present Mess!
It is estimated that we curently have between 12 million and twenty million illegal immigrants who live and most work in the U.S., and the President and Congress is on the verge of granting AMNESTY to all of them!
The proposed immigration amnesty would benefit the 12 to 20 million undocumented aliens (illegal immigrants) currently living in the United States. An amnesty for illegal aliens forgives their acts of illegal immigration and implicitly forgives other related illegal acts such as driving and working with false documents. The result of an amnesty is that large numbers of foreigners who illegally gained entry into the United States are rewarded with legal status (Green Card) for breaking immigration laws.

The United States has granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants through different amnesty and laws. Before the first amnesty in 1986, amnesty was only given on a case by cases basis. Amnesty was never given to a large group of individuals. The first (and supposedly one-time only) amnesty in 1986 gave about 2.8 million illegal immigrations the opportunity to change their status through the Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA).
to them all.
The leftists, who want these illegals to become legal so they could and will vote to promote more socialist programs , will protest that this is not really amnesty. But the following is taken directly from U.S.Immigration Amnestyinternet site:
"Undocumented Workers Currently in the United States:
They could come forward immediately and receive probationary legal status.
Bill creates a four-year, renewable Z visa for those present within the U.S. unlawfully before Jan. 1, 2007.
Undocumented immigrants may adjust status to lawful permanent residence once they pay $5,000 in fees and fines and their head of household returns to their home country.
People under age 30 who were brought to the U.S. as minors could receive their green cards after three years, rather than eight.
Undocumented farm workers who can demonstrate they have worked 150 hours or three years in agriculture can apply for green cards.
No green cards for Z visa holders can be processed until “triggers” for border security and workplace enforcement have been met, estimated to take 18 months. Processing of green cards for holders of Z visas would begin after clearing an existing backlog, which is expected to take eight years."
With one stoke of his Presidential pen, the man who was elected twice by Conservatives who value their citizenship and want secure borders, will make a mockery of Ellis Island and all those immigrants who gained citizenship the legal way.
I would expect the Leftist Congress to do such a dastardly act, but not President Bush, who if he gives amnesty to 12-20 million illegals makes a mockery of the "rule of law"!

Don't Believe The Lies!

The American people have been duped into believing,that with our brilliant diplomatic consultation and advice,Iraq and Afghanistan have created democracies offering all their people living under their newly formed governments true freedom to live,work,etc.
This a outright lie which has been purpatrated by our news media and our government.
They(Iraq and Afghanistan)have a"rejection" clause in both their constitutions which states their countries are Islamic countries and no other religion may be praticed other than the religion of Islam.
Not only do the Sunni and Shiite factions of Iraq hate each other while blowing each other's mosques to pieces,and constantly killing each other, they also have been persecuting Jews and Christians at a rapid pace,brutally seizing their property and murdering them mecilessly if they haven't already fled these babarous countries leaving everything behind.
Sadly,few have anyplace to go so you can figure what their fate will be.In Iraq alone Christians since about five years ago have dropped from over 1,000,000 to less than 200,000 as a result of ethnic cleansing aka murder in real language.
There is no recorded number of Jews who suffer the same plight.
The same is true in Afghanistan.These are democracies at their most infamous.Now one more little known fact which has been hidden from the American people is Saudi Arabia,supposedly our ally,has zero tolerance for the practicing of any religious faith other than the Islamic faith.
Iran which also is Arabic has zero tolerance for Christians and Jews as well.A Bible found or a group suspected of Jewish or Christian worship is swiftly punished,usually executed.
Our suspect relationship with our intolerant ally is all about oil, but what about their Arab brethern in Iran .Do we sit idly by and let their Iranian Arab brothers finish their development and use of their atomic weapons?
Meanwhile,our troops,mostly Christian and Jewish,are getting killed to let these Islamists rid their countries of Chritians and Jews.Schizopphrenic and suicidal thinking at best as we merrily accept Jihad on a worldwide basis,wishing it would go away.
I can tell you from friends who are peace loving followers of Islam,this thug run death in Allah's name to the infidels is not about to stop unless we end it militarily once and for all,in our backyards if necessary.You can play with a harmless grass snake but don't play with vipers.

WILL WE BECOME LIKE ENGLAND AND FRANCE?

France and Britain created their domestic terrorist threat: By importing hundreds of thousands of unassimilated people under the guise of multicultural love and peace. Almost all vote for the Left.

Socialists are the same all over. They don't believe in the nation-state, and sincerely try to bring about a more perfect world in which nations would not exist. They therefore knock holes in the bottom of our lifeboat, in the belief that they're doing us all a big favor. They're nice saboteurs.

When the French Left imported millions of Muslims, with Gaullist help, they were trying to import Socialist voters who would then be rewarded with welfare benefits. Today we have nightly riots in the French burbs, with thousands of cars being torched by celebrating Muslim teenagers living on welfare. When the British Left decided to important two million Pakistanis straight from the badlands of Peshawar, they knew what they were doing. The cover story was "multiculturalism" but the reality was subversion. In their minds, the new European Union was going to be the model for an international order, just like the Soviet Union used to be. It's exactly the same mindset.
Two million Pakistanis now live permanently in Britain. They vote Labour, and have a elected a floridly anti-Semitic Mayor of London

Christorher Hitchens writes:
"It's impossible to exaggerate how far and how fast this situation has deteriorated. ... I find myself haunted by a challenge that was offered on the BBC by a Muslim activist named Anjem Choudary: a man who has praised the 9/11 murders as "magnificent" and proclaimed that "Britain belongs to Allah." When asked if he might prefer to move to a country which practices Shari'a, he replied: "Who says you own Britain anyway?""
Will the United States follow the Brits to disaster?
It is apparent to this blogger that the UN is about to insulate Islamist terrorists from any spoken or written criticism. The following quote is from the "The Religion Of Peace.com", and it portends what is coming at us from the United Nations. An Organization more than half filled with people who hate the United States, which should have been moved out of this country years ago.
"The worst form of terrorism. Worse than flying commercial airliners into high-rise office buildings. Worse than beheading preteen Christian girls on their way to school. Worse than launching attacks from civilian areas in order to use retaliatory actions to score propaganda points. And with Ban Ki-Moon(New UN Sec. Gen.) vowing to do the OIC's bidding more zealously than ever, watch for the UN to call for muzzling of all "criticism of Islam," i.e., exploration of the elements of Islam that the jihadists are using to encourage violence. And that will allow the jihadists to operate unhindered.

The intent of CAIR and all other Muslim advocate groups is to close the mouths of people like Steven Emerson, a terrorism expert, who had the following to say in a speech at Cleary University in England this week.

Talking as a part of Cleary University's Livingston Economic Club Speaker Series, Emerson said groups with harmless-sounding names like the Benevolence International Foundation or the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, are really front groups for Islamic fundamentalists and terrorists.


"That's probably the most vexing problem we face," he said.

Speaking of CAIR, Emerson said the group was an "ideological front for terrorists and their apologists. They have defended, championed and rationalized" terrorism.

"If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it is a duck. But it's treated as an innocent group," Emerson said.

He also said," moderate Muslims need to step up and condemn terrorism, but they need more help from the government."

He said," the government should also stop meeting with and legitimizing the front groups he criticized."

"We need to determine and establish a policy: We are not going to meet with groups that believe in violence as part of the way to carry out a political agenda," Emerson said.

He also took some questions from the audience at Genoa Woods Conference Center near Brighton. The first was on the war in Iraq, and whether it has helped or hurt the war on terror.

Emerson said that in the short term, the war has provided a rallying cry for jihadists, although they "never needed an excuse" to hate America.

In the long term, however, "I don't believe the war in Iraq provided any more of an external excuse for jihadists to attack us," he said.

Plus, he added, al-Qaida would quickly fill the vacuum if American troops were withdrawn too soon.

After his speech, Emerson said he has been called a racist in the past, but emphasized that he doesn't generalize about all Muslims.

"I don't assume anybody I meet is a terrorist," he said. He put the blame on radical Muslims for blurring the distinction between mainstream and fundamentalist Islam. He said being suspicious of mainstream Muslim groups versus taking what they say at face value when he suspects they are actually radicals is "the lesser of two evils."

What he is saying is that in this age of Terrorist warfare we must never let down our guard despite all the attacks from the left and propaganda groups for Islamists such as CAIR.

This is a time for vigilance and not for "PC" attitudes. Our nations survival as the last bastion of Democratic individual freedom is certainly in jeopardy from without and within our nation.

And letting 12 million illegals become citizens via amnesty legislation will only exacerbate our problem!

The Congressional Tax Hog

The Democrats have been in a leadership position in Congress less than a year and the "tax hogs" are attacking us already.
The tax cuts which President Bush introduced and the Congress controlled by Republicans passed in 2001 and 2004 will expire in 2008. They will expire because the Democrats want the $3.026.00 that the average taxpayer saved on his yearly tax bill.
They want the money so the Socialists (aka Democrats) want the money to expand their Socialistic programs.
They can't fund the grab for more control of our personal lives without the money!
House Budget Resolution for 2008 passed March 29, 2007, and would increase taxes significantly over the next five years.
According to published research by the Heritage Foundation this will result in an immediate decrease in job growth, except for federal government employment which always grows when Democrats take over. It will reduce personal income, and weaken Our economy.
Since the Democrats have refused to take up the extension of President Bush's tax cuts. They will expire in 2008, and will cost the average American tax payer whose income stays static, 3,026 dollars!
If this wasn't enough pain for the American taxpayer, there is a movement in Congress to repeal the 1998 Internet Tax Freedom Act.
This law was introduced by Congressman Chris Cox and Senator Ron Wyden.
Internet access is a modality that millions of Americans have taken for granted as a tax free source of learning, communication and enjoyment. Not if the Democrats have their way!
The present law forbids taxation by federal state or local governments of internet access, "bit taxes", bandwidth tax, or email tax.
The idea behind the original law, that was supported by both Republicans and Democrats, was to provide affordable Internet Access to all Americans.
House Bill 743 and Senate Bill 156 address the extension of the Internet Tax Freedom Act, and all you people who use the internet should write, call or fax your Congressional representatives to support the law presently on the books.
If the Tax Freedom Act is allowed to expire or is repealed you can expect all state, local and federal government bodies to begin taxing Our Internet.
Politicians make many promises to get elected. The problem is they are always looking for new sources of revenue to pay for the promises. That is if they were not just lying in the first place while tring to get elected as so many do.
Knowlege is power and to be forewarned is to be armed and ready to defend!

Time To Strike Iran With Bunker Busters

The former ambassador to the United Nations from the United States, John Bolton, spoke to the staff of the London Telegraph yesterday.
In his presentation he said it was time to realize that we will be unable to talk Iran into abandoning their quest to produce a nuclear bomb capability.
He revealed that the UN nuclear inspectors had reported that Irans' over 1300 centrifuges have already produced refined uranium that is over the 4% purity needed to produce their stated purpose of developing nuclear power generators, and it will be a year or less until they have the the 84% purity needed to make a nuclear device.
He did not make this up out of "thin cloth". The information he presented was from the head of the IAEA, Mohammed ElBaadei. This man also said that the UN quest to stop Iran from producing enriched uranium had already been "outreached by events". Meaning we are too late, they have already reached that point.
Mr. Bolton went on to say that "Iran with a nuclear weapon could be as dangerous as Adolph Hitler marching into the Rhineland in 1936."
To further exacerbate the problem confronting a concerned Free World. The following was received yesterday from intelligence sources in the Far East and reported byThe Telegraphs' Richard Spencer in Beijing.
"North Korea has used a launch-pad in Iran to test-fire a new long-range missile capable of hitting American bases in the Pacific, according to reports from Japan and South Korea.

The missile, known as a Musudan-type, was shown to the public at a vast military parade in the North Korean capital Pyongyang, according to the reports.

South Korean and American intelligence reports suggest it was then tested not from North Korean soil but from Iran, with which North Korea is known to have close military co-operation.

The missile, which could target the US military on the Pacific island of Guam, was previously unrecorded.

North Korea has a known capacity in short and medium-range missiles, including the Taeopodong-1 which it fired over Japan in 1998 to the alarm of Tokyo and its allies in Washington."

It is time for the Congress of the United States and the President to seriously consider attacking the known Iranian Nuclear facilities with the full force of the Air Force, Navy and Marine planes with Bunker buster bombs. Nukes if necessary.

Radical times require radical and punishing acts. I believe if we dither around much longer we will awake some morning and one of our coastal cities will be gone!

No Way To Win The Peace In Iraq

The looting and killing of civilians in Iraq should have been stopped by now. After the statue of Saddam fell if the U.S. military had begun immediately to shoot looters on sight and and declared marshal. Law order would have been established.
Carpet bombing the roads from Syria and Iran would have closed the Syrian and Iranian borders to stop foreign terrorist infiltration. The outcry from Europeans and our Media would have arisen immediately. Accusations would follow that we were too brutal and were gunning down poor and hungry people.
But wars involve killing people, and those who won't kill before they are killed will never win at war!
We may have forgotten that one of the reasons for the speed of the American advance and then the sudden rush to stop military operations - as was true in the first Gulf War - was the enormous criticism leveled by the Europeans at the Americans for going to war in the first place, and the constant litany, that began almost immediately, of American abuses involving excessive force. Shooting looters may have restored order, but it also would have been enshrined as an "Abu-Ghraib-like" crime.
The Media would have shown a photo of a dead poor "hungry" Iraqi. It would have been broadcast globally as an unarmed victim of American barbarism.
We can imagine charges of more "Highway of Death" outrage had we bombed concentrations of foreign terrorists pouring in from Iran or from Syria., whom the Media would report were going to "weddings" and "festivals" in Iraq.
Throughout this "Surgical" war, the military has been been between a rock and a hard place. Don't shoot and you are accused of not doing your duty and allowing lawlessness to spread; shoot and you are immediately slandered by Media pundits as a sort of rogue LAPD in camouflage. You may even be made an example of in a Courts Martial filled with "PC" military judges.
We hear only of the deliberately exaggerated reports of "Iraqi civilian losses" - without any explanation that almost all the Iraqi dead are either (1) victims of the terrorists, (2) Iraqi security forces trying to defend the innocent against the terrorists, or (3) the terrorists themselves.
Our efforts to save civilians during the war, left Iraqi civilians of today endangered by the Muslim death squads of both Shiite and Sunni groups.
The same thing happened in Vietnam, on a massive scale, because in that case the U.S. didn't merely pull its punches, it pulled its military forces out entirely. Per Larry Elder
Our withdrawal, however, gave the Vietnamese armies under Ho Chi Minh free rein to overrun South Vietnam - raping, pillaging, plundering, impoverishing, imprisoning, torturing and slaughtering hundreds of thousands of civilians. It also gave the Pol Pot regime an opportunity to wage the greatest genocide since Stalins purge in the USSR. Millions were killed, and the same thing will happen if the Democrats have their way in Iraq.

If Wisconsin Democrats Want Hillary She Must Be A Socialist

It was really no big surprise when the Wisconsin Democrat executive committee endorsed Senator Hillary Clinton for President.
I grew up in Wisconsin and for most of my formative years I lived under the Socialistic regime of Mayor Frank Ziedler(1948-1960). He ran adds in the papers of major Southern cities for laborers to come to Milwaukee where he guaranteed them jobs in his growing "little socialist" city.
The unemployment rate in Milwaukee today is a reflection of that mass migration of Black workers and the loss of industry due to high tax rates in Wisconsin.
In my grade school years I listen often and intently about the man my Dad despised. He previously was one of the founders of the Socialist Party of America.His name was Congressman Andrew J. Biemiller (1942-43 and 1948-49), and he was one of the first Congressman to introduce proposed legislation for "Socialized Medicine".
This Congressman was a dedicated supporter of Henry Wallace for President. Wallace was a Socialist running in the Presidential election against Harry Truman. He also helped to form the Americans For Democratic Action
Milwaukee also had a socialist Mayor named David Hoan in 1932, and had a man who was literally Mister "Progressive, Robert La Follette,Sr., who ran for President as a Progressive in 1924 .
With a leftist history like this, you can readily understand why the Democrats in Wisconsin endorsed a Socialist ideologue like Hillary Clinton.
Fortunately I am not alone in the identification of Senator Clinton as a Socialist.
The following is a quote from todays issue of PATRIOT POST by Tony Blankley.
"Likely (democrat) nominee, Hillary Milhous Clinton is, by prior and now private inclination, an anti-military radical feminist Euro-Socialist come Trotskyite who is masquerading as a pro-military, free market, religious centrist.

She is considered the experienced candidate, although she has had few responsibilities in her life (and no accomplishments) other than to be the put-upon wife of Gov./President William Jefferson Blythe Clinton. But she now speaks easily of “our administration” when referring to the United States government from 1993-2000 (her husband's administration.) I wonder whether Socks the Cat and Buddy the Dog (whereever they are today, God bless them) also meow and bark about “our administration." But the media and the public accept that she is “experienced." I suppose she is, of a sort.

Unloved and off-putting as she is, she will probably get her party's nomination even though its left-leaning party voters reject her public centrism, while she is afraid to publicly utter her private “sinistre” political yearnings -- which policies are exactly what her party regulars want."

I would also like to add that Hillary was part of the "hatchet" team that "cooked" up the impeachment of President Clinton. I guess "what goes around, comes around" is appropriate!

Wars Of Attrition Never Bring Victory

It seems to this blogger that President Bush and his Military Commander in Iraq, General Petraeus are tring to fight a clean surgical war in Iraq.
Even though the Terrorist Islamists are willing to behead those they captured,use Chlorine gas and embedded bombs to kill indiscriminately. We are trying to win using the weakest part of our military arsenal. There are no flame throwers, no tank brigades, no carpet bombings and no mass artillery bombardments on cities that are known hideouts for terrorists.
We are trying to go from house to house rooting out terrorists like we had to do in the caves of Iwo Jima, Tarawa and Okinawa. Where we lost 15,439 troops.
The difference is these valiant men and women in Iraq are doing their jobs with only Humvees, armed personal carriers, rifles and machine guns.
The results are seen on TV and in the Main Stream Press daily. More troops killed every week if not daily, and no end in sight.
To make it worse when the troops get into a fire fight with the enemy, and who can tell who the enemy is when women and children as well as men, are involved in the fighting quite often.If they kill civilians the troops involved are too often subject to court martial.
One such ridiculous event is going on at this very moment involving the investigating team of JAG lawyers who are Marines.
These lawyers were ordered to investigate the killing of 24 civilians during a firefight in Haditha during November 2005.
Apparently this Article 32 hearing, that is the military equivalent of a grand jury, was prompted by Major General Bargewell, when he heard from the "chain of Command":"Iraqi civilian lives are not as important as United States troops lives, and casualties of civilians is just the result of doing business."
I would hope the Commander of our forces values the lives of our troops more than he does the Iraqis. If he doesn't. He should go back to West Point and study a little history.
During WWII the cities of Hamburg and Dresden were fire bombed day and night using explosives bombs first to take of the roof tops of dwellings and then incendiaries to start fire storms that reached 1500 degrees and killed according to the Columbia Encyclopediabetween 35,000 and 135,000 civilians in one night in Hamburg! In March of 1944 we bombed Dresden over 3 days with 7,831 tons of explosive and incendiary bombs to aid the Russian advance on Berlin, and killed over 35,000 civilians!
I am not saying this was a "war crime" or that we should firebomb Iraq. What I am saying is that it is past time when we let "political correctness' and the "mommy attitude" guide our effort to win the war in Iraq.
It is time to quit fighting the terrorists war, and fight our way to Victory.
We can identify cities and town in parts of Iraq where the most terrorist attacks are being perpetrated. Then bomb these places to smithereens! No more house to house rooting out!
Give the Marines back their flame throwers, and use them whenever an enemy if located.
Wars do have casualties. People get killed and it is too bad if civilians get in the way, but it is better than the continuous parade of body bags coming home.
But I digress!! The Article 32 hearing for Captain Randy Stone is a disgrace to the Marine corps, and reeks of Political Correctness. This has no place in the Marine corps., and it tarnishes a glorious heritage for it to even begin. Capt. Stone is the first of four Marine officers to be charged with dereliction of duty for failing to investigate "properly" 24 civilian deaths in Haditha in November 2005. Having reviewed the facts — what you might call his politically correct job as battalion lawyer — Capt. Stone determined no further investigation was warranted. In other words, he came to a politically incorrect conclusion. (So did his superiors, but he's the guy on trial — another story.) Capt. Stone could get three years in prison. Three enlisted Marines are charged with unpremeditated murder. They could get life. At least eight other Marines may have been granted immunity to testify. The whole case exudes the terrible, rotting stench of eating our own.

Described in the heavy-breathing press as "the biggest U.S. criminal case involving civilian deaths in the Iraq war," the incident sounds less like a war crime than, well, a war.

"Here's what happened: A convoy of Marines trolling insurgent-riddled Haditha was hit by a huge IED. A Humvee was destroyed. One Marine was killed (split in two). Two other Marines were wounded (one grievously). There was a lot of shooting at an approaching Iraqi car. There was a lot of shooting at two nearby Iraqi houses where Marines heard, as The New York Times put it, "the distinct metallic sound of an AK-47 being prepared to fire." As one Marine witness explained, "the squad leader thought he was about to kick in the door and walk into a machine gun." In the end, no additional Marines had died, but 24 Iraqi civilians, including some children, had been killed."
The preceding is an excerpt from "Diana Wests' Blog".
We should support our troops as we did in WWII even if casualties occur, as long as they are not lined up against a wall and shot.
Stop the political correctness. This is war not a playground game where nobody gets hurt!

Democrat Front Runners For '08 Are Socialists

In my previous blog posting I described what I believe Senator H.Clinton has put forward in her plans for her administration if she, only heaven can help us if she does, makes it to the Oval Office. The plans she has outlined could well have been drawn up by Lenin and Trotsky.
Now we have her closest competitor Senator Obama proposing more of the same socialistic programs.
In a speech over the weekend he had the following to say:
"I call for improving fuel efficiency. My plan is for the government to pay ten percent of domestic automakers’ health care costs for retired workers, allowing them to put that money into research and development of more fuel-efficient vehicles."
Other tax incentives Obama proposed would allow for recalibrating factories to produce more hybrid vehicles. The price tag for such a program would run $20 billion over ten years.
This proposal departs from Obama’s earlier promotion of coal-to-liquid technology, which runs afoul of environmentalists because of the high level of carbon dioxide resulting from the conversion of coal to liquid fuel. Rather than support the pursuit of new fuel technologies, Obama has decided to play it safe with his liberal supporters by offering yet another government cure-all instead of letting market forces drive innovation.
While the Senator proposes more government involvement in private enterprise to court Union voters, the President is attempting to get some traction in Congress for the drilling for oil off shore and in ANWAR wilderness to develop independence from the increasingly hostile Middle East and Venezuela.
He addressed tho oil independence yesterday and again today during a televised press conference:
President Bush introduced a plan that would expand drilling to include the Gulf of Mexico, as well as the coasts of Alaska and Virginia. Predictably, environmentalists will fight this every step of the way, but realistic folks who want true energy independence will have a tough time saying no to 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
The President talks of expanding our economic independence, and both Hillary and Obama talk of ever increasing socialistic programs that will eventually destroy our Free Enterprise Private Sector by increasing government programs that require more government employees and more tax dollars if voters don't stop them at the polls in 2008!

Hillary Is The Socialist Candidate For Certain

As far as this blogger is concerned. Senator Hillary Clinton came out of the closet yesterday, and declared herself as a Socialist.
At a Democrat fund raising dinner in Columbus, Ohio she proclaimed that if elected she will see that we get universal health care, withdrawal of the troops from Iraq immediately, appropriate funds for alternative sources of energy and hire MORE government employees who are qualified people.
What she means by qualified is a conundrum. Does she mean the government that is presently overloaded with over paid and richly covered with benefits are presently incompetent? If she means that I would agree with her.
What she really means, I believe, is she will hire more leftist leaning people to enlarge the democrat voting block that already exists in Washington. If this isn't socialism I am from another planet!
Earlier in the day she gave a commencement address at an all Black University in South Carolina. She promised the graduates of Claflin University that if she is elected she will push for legislation that includes"a student bill of rights". No such right exists in the Constitution, but that hasn't stopped the leftists in Congress and the Supreme Court from establishing new "rights" at will.
This student bill of rights will mandate that student loans be contracted taking into consideration the students ability to pay back the loan, and will be based upon a percentage of the students income. This will by law keep fees and interest rates "reasonable" per Hillary.
The first thing that comes to my mind is who will pay the difference. The "Big Bad" Lenders as Hillary would have you believe won't be able to absorb the loss such a program mandates. It is you and I the hard working taxpayer who will have to "pony-up" the tax dollars to cover all her promised socialism!
This Country will travel down the same road to insolvency as has most of Europe if this woman gets into the Oval Office. God help the middle class if she does!

AN OPEN LETTER TO SECRETARY GATES

Dear Secretary Gates.

I am writing to you in hopes that what I have learned is news to You also. If it is not, then I must consider the possibility that political correctness and gross stupidity has infiltrated the Defense Department as it has obviously attacked the State Department.

It is one thing to ask people to volunteer to go into harms way for the good of their fellow country men. But it is complrte and utter stupidity to take the ammunition out of the weapons they will most surely need if and when their post is attacked. That is what safety locks are for!

The following partial quote is from todays Washington Times. Please read it and please put the ammunition back into our troops weapons at all times. We have trained these men and women to fight, but not with their hands tied behind their backs!

FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES 5/12/2007

"US troops are being forced to carry unloaded weapons on most US bases because commanders are more worried about a "negligent" discharge than the very real likelihood of a terrorist attack by an insider on the base. The rule is all the more disconcerting because these troops are in areas where they receive combat pay..."This selection of political correctness and safety concerns over force protection contrasts markedly with combat experience in World War II, Korea or Vietnam, where soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines were required to be armed — with loaded weapons — at all times," one official said. "This is a gross failure of leadership, and in all likelihood has contributed to the US casualty rate," the official said. The officer in Iraq said the unloaded-gun rule is a symptom of bigger military leadership problems, especially in the Army. "Unfortunately, many military leaders are little more than managers, and many of those have consciously chosen to reduce themselves to the level of permanent administrator, because it is safer for their careers than risking real decision-making," he said...A soldier in Afghanistan said the no-loaded-weapons rule is true for bases there as well, adding that soldiers are required to unload weapons after returning from "Indian country".

The Democrat Congress is trying to force Our troops to retreat from Iraq by cutting off funds. This is an act of perfidy, but making soldiers empty their weapons in an enemy combat zone is idiotic! You can and should change this policy immediately. I hope to ALMIGHTY GOD you will!

Sincerely,GWW

Maybe We Should Withdraw the Foot Soldiers and Bomb

I have always been a person who supports the Conservative position. Right or wrong the conservative position has been my way of thinking. It is why I have supported President bush through all the negativity that has been dumped on him during this "righteous" war against Islamist terrorism.
But if you read my posting earlier today we may have to finally realize that we have "the fox in the hen house". Al-Maliki could be the "fox"!
For this reason I am posting an opinion which I have to admit sounds not only plausible but perhaps the only thing to do at this point in time.
It hurts me deeply to admit we are in a situation that has no end, and I realize that Our withdrawal will result in genocide for certain. But if the elected leadership in Washington fails to grasp the threat to Us from Iran. It may be time to reconsider our commitment.
I agree with the readers comments that follow. We should abandon the "boots on the ground" approach, and bomb the living H**l out of any place in Syria, Iraq and Iran that we know is a haven for Terrorists.
The following is from an ultra conservative like myself, that I trust.

The only positive solution to the whole problem in the Middle East liberal created lovefest,in my opinion, and our only way out of a quagmire produced by a gutless U.S. Congress who have all but waved a white flag to the murderous terrorists,along with the sad support by a weak liberal Israeli Prime Minister Olmert, who has also allowed the terrorists to increase their resolve in the fighting in Iraq and in destroying the sovereignty of Israel by his cowardice, is to pull out of Iraq,drop many "bunker buster" bombs on Iran to destroy Iran's nuclear development sites,and tell the Middle East to go to hell in a hand basket.
The Israelis apparently,with a cowardly pacifist at their helm, and doing nothing to rid themselves of this coward, are content to let the barbarians,once again,take away their God given right to freedom.
Thousands of years of asinine,foolish attempts at reasonable persuasion by pompous idealogue has done nothing, but for brief periods of time,to stop the ongoing bloodshed.
History is repeating itself and we would be best to concentrate on ridding our country of its treacherous politicians who have flaunted President Bush in a treasonous way, in the next election, and build a super strong defensive capability.
However,this in all likelihood is wishful thinking with the morally corrupt state this country is in today.God Bless an Help America.

Very Difficult To Win With Enemies Within

President Bush has enough trouble keeping up the "good fight" in Iraq while fighting the "retreat at all cost" Democrats and a left wing Media printing only negative reports about the war.
He certainly does not need a fifth column at the seat of power in the new Iraqi government. It would seem, however,if you can believe the reports coming out of the "Middle East Research Institute" that he has a real problem with the Prime Minister of the new Iraqi government.
Those who don't spend all of their news gathering time watching network Tv or reading the Washington Post or New York Times know that Syria and Iran have a stake in this fight. Both countries have been coduits for weapons to the terrorists trying to drive Our servicemen and women out.
Now the following was uploaded to the internet this morning. When you read it realize the dilema we and the President have if it is true. The Left wing Congress will dance in the streets and raise a cold one.
Al-Maliki Calls to Withdraw Iranian Revolutionary Guards Commanders from the Iraqi Front in Order to Protect Them
The first document, labeled "secret, personal, and urgent," is a January 2007 letter from Al-Maliki's office to the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad, with copies to the presidency of the [Shi'ite party] Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq and to the Al-Shahid Al-Sadr organization." [2] In it, Al-Maliki requests that the commanders of the Mahdi Army, who have ties with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, be pulled off the Iraqi frontlines, in order to protect them from being arrested or killed. The following is a translation of the document:
"Secret, Personal and Urgent


"Based on a phone conversation with Sayyid Muqtada Al-Sadr and [after] consulting with [Iraq's National Security Advisor] Dr. Muwafaq Al-Rubai'i, in order to preserve our great achievements and in light of what the present circumstances demand, we ask to temporarily conceal the commanders of the Mahdi Army, who are connected to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, [and to remove them] from the front line [of battle] in order to protect them from being arrested or killed by the American forces. [The names of the commanders] are listed below. It would be best to send them to Iran for the time being, until the crisis passes.

"In addition, [we ask] to send the commanders from the second line [of battle] to the southern regions, since we know that intensive efforts are underway to persuade the Americans to leave the situation [there] as it is. All administrative and security arrangements for the transportation of these commanders have [already] been made.

"We ask you to implement [these orders] and report to us.

"[Signed,] Nouri Al-Maliki, Prime Minster [of Iraq]

"The Iranian Embassy [in] Baghdad,

"The presidency of the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq,
"Huston we have a Problem", comes to mind!

Clinton Could Have Stopped The Jihad

In a camp not far from Peshawar a meeting between President Clintons emissary Abu Umar Ameriki(means American) and the leader of the Egyptian Jihad and doctor to Bin Laden, Shaykh Aymam Al- Zawahiri was held. The alleged purpose of the meeting was to let the Jihadist that President Clinton was not only willing to not interfere if the Islamists wished to depose the government of Mubarak in Egypt if the Islamists would reduce the terrorist threat to the United States. To sweeten the deal Clinton allegedly offered fifty million dollars in aid to the new government if they succeeded.
This meeting was held in 1997 after the two bombings of Embassies had taken place in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi Kenya killing 80 people.
The man the Clinton emissary met with, Al-Zawahiri had alredy said in an interview with Yossef Bodansky during December 1997 "that a conflict between the Muslim nation (Ummah) and the United States is unavoidable. He further stated that they knew the weakness of the U.S. and Israel was their vulnerability to receiving dead bodies of their sons, and therefore, we shall throw in their faces the flesh of their sons, minced and grilled. The United States must pay the price, it must pay it dearly."
It would appear that our government intelligence would have picked up on this statement and informed the decision makers in Clintons Cabinet that it was impossible to bargain with this kind of monster. Apparently it was ignored for more important matters like Lewinski affairs!
Since the debacle that was the Dual headed Presidency of Bill and Hillary the world wide terrorist Jihad has grown exponentially.
The following quote is from a lengthy interview recently with this "doctor of death" Al-Zawahiri in Egypt.
"The road to reform, and Allah knows best, requires, in the Arabian Peninsula and the other Islamic lands, work on two plans. The first is in the near term, and seeks to strike Crusader and Zionist interests so that the ground erupts in flames under the feet of the Zionists and Crusaders in our countries and theirs and everywhere we are able to strike their interests until they leave our countries and stop their continuous and increasing interference in our affairs.
And the second plan is for the longer term, and depends on two pillars: the first is preparation for the confrontation, by going forth to arenas of battle like Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia, and the second pillar is diligent work to change the corrupt and corrupted regimes through invitation, incitement, mobilization and planning, and to persevere in that however much time it takes or sacrifice it requires. And every time we achieve victory in one arena, that will ease - with Allah's help - victory in the next one.
And from this, the critical importance of the Jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan becomes clear, because the defeat of the Crusaders there - soon, Allah permitting, will lead to the setting up of two Mujahid Emirates which will be launch pads for the liberation of the Islamic lands and the establishment of the Caliphate, with Allah's permission."
At the conclusion of his interview he made a call for all Black soldiers wearing the uniform of the United States to throw off the uniforms of "their enslavers" and come over to the Islamist side!
If you don't believe the Democrat fight to get the troops out of Iraq won't cause a worst genocide since Hitler then you are brain dead or so hateful of the military that you want to see them loose again! May God not let that happen.

What Did You Do Daddy?

In the Academy Award movie Patton there was a speech given to the assembled army that Patton was to lead into battle that has relevance today as it did in 1943.During his forceful and inspiring speech he said the following:
" Thirty years from now, when you're sitting around your fireside with your grandson on your knee and he asks you, "What did you do in the great World War II," you won't have to say, "Well... I shoveled s**t in Louisiana."
If Senators Reid, Clinton, and the complete Democrat Senatorial delegation are asked this question 30 years from now by their grandchildren they will have to say: "Well I voted to cut off funds for the deployment of more troops being sent to Iraq." I got word from "Move On" that if I didn't vote to cut off funds and demand withdrawal immediately they wouldn't support Us in 2008. So you see. I did what any patriotic Democrat would do in that situation. I had no idea the Islamist "insurgents" would get their hands on a nuclear bomb and set it off in Chicago!
Nancy Pelosi will say: I took the President to court because he wouldn't listen to Me. You know I was appointed "queen" of the Congress, and the President had no right to ignore me.
Congressman Conyers could say :I decided that during war was as good a time as any to Impeach that "liar" in the Oval Office. How else could a little known Congressman get the attention I deserved?"
The Congressional Democrats have lost the civility that once was the identity of those Congressmen who came from the Deep South to show the Yankees how it should be done.Now The "blue dogs" are gone.
Today the rhetoric coming out of the mouths of most Democrats is the hate speech of a dock worker, with apologies to the the dock worker!
The hate literally drips from the mouths of not only those who are elcted to National office, but also from their supporters. Bloggers, newspaper writers and TV anchors have a rancor toward everything President Bush and his supporters attempt to do or has done.
Unfortunately since we took God out of government the split between good and evil has begun in ernest. Those who wish to keep our Country with the Judeo-Christian foundation on one side, and those that want desperatly to make us a Welfare secular society on the other.
Maybe it is time we call it like it is. There are Conservatives and there are Liberals, Democrat and Republican no longer identify who they are and what thay stand for!

Time For Congress To Act

Medicare is in serious trouble


Matt Moore, senior policy analyst at the National Center for Policy Analysis wrote the following piece today. I believe he has hit upon one of the major causes for this Countrys'financial disaster or the worst betrayal by Our Government if this program fails.
Unfortunately, for too many years the Congress has had no "spine" to address the growing problem that awaits when there are more Medicare recipients than there are workers to generate the taxes to support the program. His piece has been copied below in part.

"But this time, just maybe, it will turn out different, says Moore. This time the president and Congress have to do something about it:

An obscure provision in the 2003 law that added prescription drugs to Medicare requires the Medicare trustees to raise a flag if two consecutive reports predict Medicare will draw more than 45 percent of its funding from general revenues within the next seven years.
In short, if Medicare is expected to drain too much income tax money from the federal government within the next seven years, the trustees have to alert Congress.
The 2006 report was the first to cross the threshold, and this year's report required the trustees to officially sound the alarm.
Both the President and congressional leaders should take the warning to heart: Medicare is growing really fast, says Moore:

Within the next two decades, Medicare will drain almost a quarter of federal income tax revenue.
By 2030, about the midpoint of the baby boomer retirement years, Medicare will take more than a third.
Eventually, Medicare spending will drain nearly every tax dollar the government raises; in all, we're talking somewhere in the neighborhood of $60 trillion.
As a result, we need to rethink how Medicare works, says Moore. For example, we could combine all the parts of Medicare, including the prescription drug benefit and individually-purchased Medigap policies, into a single plan with a single premium. In addition, people should be allowed and encouraged to save money while working to fund future elderly health care benefits."
We hope Congress stops trying to destroy the President and will finally address some of the fiscal problems that must be fixed if this Republic is to survive, but I won't hold my breath until they do. Partisan politics has made a circus of our Congress, and I don't expect it to stop very soon.
It is time for Americans to elect fiscal conservatives who will save our dollar and our economy. We have had enough of the politicians who get to Washington by promising more government programs.The march toward Socialism has been relentless on both sides of the isle. Now it is time for us to stop it!



Posted by Doctor Bills Comments at 5:32 PM - No Comments Add a Comment

The Fifth Column IS Everywhere

The propagandists for the enemy we face is not an amorphous Islamist group. It is a well organized and fervently dedicated organization called Al Qaeda. It is operating world wide,and for our troops at war with them it is found in Afghanistan,and Iraq. Unfortunately the brain thrust and logistics comes from Iran. Even though the strings of their operations are being pulled by the Iranians. It would seem we are restrained from decapitating the head that leads this monster who would destroy us.
This week the newspaper read by over 240,000 people worldwide everyday, The International Herald Tribune, is aiding and abetting our enemy.
The New York Times owns the International Herald Tribune, but no mention was made in any of its' papers about the Add for "bids to build two nuclear power plants in Iran" that ran in the International Herald Tribune.
The add included telephone numbers and email addesses to use by anyone capable and willing to assist in furthering their nuclear program. It also made references to Banks that could be contacted for financial transactions.
All of this despite the United Nations numerous sanctions and demands that Iran cease their nuclear proliferation program!
If Iran is successful in getting these two reactors built in addition to their nuclear plants with 133 centrifuges now in working order. We can expect the Iranians will have nuclear bombs and missiles to deliver them in a few years at most.
This scenario will bring about a situation similar to the condition we have with North Korea today. Blackmail with nuclear treats on both sides of our continent, and blackmail hovering over the whole Middle East oil fields.
Here at home the NEA appears to be a "dupe" or willing accomplice of Al Qaeda in its' relentless curriculum overload with leftist text books that rewrite history, courses on diversity, cultural awareness and understanding. All of which are intended to warp young minds into believing that their Country is bad and something to be ashamed of.
With the curriculum packed full of negative "pseudo" facts and glorification of other cultures some schools have gone so far as to have "BE a Muslim" for a day. No not be a Jew or a Catholic for a day, but dress up like a Muslim and act and eat like a Muslim in the name of diversity education.
A perfect example of Muslim appreciation of our Culture is the Muslim Students Association that demanded, from George Mason University, the right to use the "Quiet Meditation Space" ( I believe this is the "PC" term for a chapel) in the Johnson Center on the Campus of George Mason U.for their prayer services five times a day. Other religious followers cannot come in at any time unless they remove their shoes and the women pray separately from the men as do the Muslims.
These Muslim Student Associations are located on over 150 American college campuses and were founded and continue to be supported by Wahhabists in Saudi Arabia with the express of spreading Wahhabism.
From this viewpoint it appears we are being attacked from all sides, and all of the subversion is not yet involved with the use of weapons.

Jewish Voters Should Be Concerned

Many American Jews fail to identify with their Biblical past because they are of the opinion that the past is all a bunch of myths and they react only if a racial slur is uttered against them.
Biblical history indicates this was true when they were banished to Egypt for their immoral aloofness to God.
It took Moses to lead a stubborn bunch of people back to their God honored homeland after wandering the desert for forty years.
Too many Jews, like many Christians and non believers ,have lost their appreciation of the main purpose for existing in this life. Love of God, and your fellow "man".
Democrats, as they falsely call themselves today, are not the Democrats of the 40's. Too many are socialistic psuedo-intellectuals who believe left wing internationalism trumps every thought of a true democracy.
For American Jews to vote for a party that has appeared to endeared itself to those who are determined to destroy the Jews in Israel and eventually to rule the world, is irrationality at its finest.
Rigt minded people don't hand a loaded gun to an apparent enemy, but this is what,sadly,many Jews and so called mainstream Americans did in 2006 by voting Democrat.
The "Blue Dog" Democrat is a schlemeil who votes for Democrats because his father or grandfather did without checking on the people who now claim to be Democrats.
Too Many are pure socialists of the Lenin/Stalin/Marxist philosophical mode.The poor and the downtrodden have benefitted little from these "flim flam" artists of taxation without representation.
They are also filled with hate as demonstrated by them with their relations with President Bush in the past six years.
The Holocaust remains stamped forever in my brain but apparently, not in the minds of people who voted "Democrat"in the elections of 2004 and 2006.
A repeat performance in 2008 will be a disaster for Jews.
Ask Joe Lieberman about the ruthlessness of the Democratic party that tried their darnedest to defeat him by supporting a known anti-war socialist in 2006.Fortunately,Sen.Joseph Lieberman,a true American who supports Israel's sovereignty,was able to win reelection as an Independent,not as a so-called Democrat. God Bless America.And please don't let Israel down by voting Democratic in '08!

Jewish Voters Should Look at Facts

Traditionally the Jewish voter has been pulling levers and marking ballots for Democratic candidates for decades. Maybe it is part of their liberal mindset that was brought with their ancestors who arrived in this Country fleeing from persecution and prejudice.
President Roosevelt was the personification of the liberalism they believe in, and the habit has followed them for decades ever since.
But now we have a set of circumstances which are entirely different and should be of concern for those who are Jewish and plan to vote in the 2008 election for President.
In 2004 Jews voted for Democrats 75% of the votes cast by Jewish voters. In 2006 the percentage grew to 87%. The trend does not seem to support a full knowledge of the Democrats philosophy and political tendencies.
There is not a Democratic candidate for president who is not for pulling out the troops in Iraq. In fact they have introduced Bills to withhold funds for the troops unless a date is set for withdrawal of the troops.So far President Bush's veto has kept this from being the law.
No matter how one feels about the reasons why or the means by which we got into this war. The one thing that is unequivocal and positive is that if we leave the Middle East we will leave Israel alone to face the worst threat to their existence since the Holocaust!
If the Democrats get elected Israel will be alone, and no amount of pressure brought to bear on congress by the Jewish lobby will give them enough weapons to ward off the avowed destruction that awaits them.
For this reason alone, baring all others. The people who value and consider Israel a Country worth preserving must not let the Democrats get the White House and continue to control Congress.
Not just Jewish people, but people of all faiths should not vote for people who are in favor of abandoning a friend in need!