A WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING

The Democrat controlled House of Representatives stuck a knife in the back of the brave men and woman fighting in Iraq yesterday. They did it while couching their perfidy in comforting words as you would expect someone to do who plans to kill you, but wants you to think he is being your friend. This dastardly act was in the form of a bill mandating equal time at home for military personnel, to that spent in Iraq before they return to fight.

"The House voted on Thursday to limit how quickly American troops can be sent back to Iraq after serving a rotation there, in the Democrats' latest challenge to Bush administration war policy," the New York Times reports. "The vote, requiring that active-duty members of the military get at least as much time at home as they served in Iraq before being sent back, passed 229 to 194."

This appears to the uninformed like a good deed. The truth is it is an idea hatched by those who have thus far failed to bring home the troops, and now plan to do it through this absurd and dangerous legislation.

Anyone who knows a thing about war, understands that when personnel leave the battlefield. They have to be replaced unless you want to present a weakened force to the enemy trying to kill you.

How many battles would we have won in the war against Japan and Nazi Germany if we rotated soldiers back home after a pre-determined time in the field? Iwo Jima, Guadalcanal, Battle of the Bulge, and many others would never have been won if it were not for the presence of battle hardened and tested troops who were in the fight until the end of the war.

Talk to any ex-military person who actually fought in combat, and they will tell you that the "grunts" who were replacements, were the first to be killed. The experience and horrors of war teach survival skills that replacements do not have.

It sounds good to the mothers, fathers, wives and children of those troops who would come home to be with their families. But how about those left in Iraq to fight without their required number of troops. A number determined by their military leaders not a cadre of power hungry politicians ,that they must go it alone?

Skills learned in battle become less effective the more the military person is away from the fight. When they finally do go back their ability to be part of an effective fighting unit will be lessened proportionate to the amount of time they are away from "country".

This war is not a football game where you have a half time and everyone goes in to rest and regroup. We are in a war against forces driven by religious fanaticism who will never quit until they or we are destroyed. What Congress did was a dangerous and dastardly deed, and will be vetoed by the President if he really cares about the boys and women fighting in Iraq!

A STRANGE PARADOX

The Federal government is presently inconsistent in the application of the liberal interpretation of the absurdity of Separation of church and State,

Liberals have managed to eliminate any reference or symbolism of Christianity from Americans public lives, but at the same time Political Correctness and multiculturalism have compelled our leadership to allow any and all demands from those who adhere to the Muslim faith.

Universities that have banned prayer meeting in school buildings in the past are now allowing Muslim prayer rooms for the five times a day Muslim prayer sessions. The Muslim advocacy group CAIR has done an excellent job of persuasion and intimidation that has resulted in a religion that has as one of it's precepts the conversion or death for all infidels(non-Muslims), but denies the same right to a religion that is based on Love, Charity and Peace.Christian prayers—even non-denominational—have been forbidden in school classrooms and the workplace. But, everything Islam is being increasingly accommodated and adopted. Christmas has been branded “taboo” by public school administrators. But, the Islamic celebration of Ramadan is not only being instilled in an increasing number of public schools but, has even been celebrated at the White House.

Most recently, with yet another strong backhand applied to the faces of all non-Muslims (specifically Christians), the University of Michigan has become the latest public entity to make the decision to ignore the U.S. Supreme Court ruling concerning the separation of church and state in the US. It's leftist/liberati administrators have made the decision that the SCOTUS decision does NOT apply to the Muslim faith. Instead, these same university officials are making increasing adjustments for Muslims and their “faith” in direct conflict with the SCOTUS decision. This is yet another example of liberals, leftists and other enemies of the Constitution of the United States of America being allowed to break the laws of our land.A law that this blogger feels is a misinterpretation of the Constitution. Yet the rest of us are subject to arrest for not being compliant with the Muslim practices.
The following quote is a good example of the double standard being applied to Muslims, Christians and Jews in this Country.It is from Sher Zieve's article in "THE NEW MEDIA".

"As yet another example of school administrators caving to Muslims’ intimidation, 23 year old Stanislav Shmulevich was arrested for placing a copy of the Islamic Koran in a toilet at Pace University. After the originated-by-terrorist-Hamas-officials group CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) complained to NYPD, police authorities charged Shmulevich with a ‘hate crime’. A hate crime against a book? However, if one does the same to a Christian Bible the authorities traditionally and historically ignore it. In other words, desecrating the Bible—or for that matter the Torah—is not considered a crime by US officials. Said “hate crimes” only applies to the Islamic Koran; just as separation of church and state applies only to Christianity and Christians."

It is past the time when we can ignore such objectionable actions. If we wish to continue to live in a free society we must speak out. Make our elected officials aware of our disgust with this double standard, and if they don't do something about it. Vote them out of their princely offices in government!

History Does Repeat Itself!

It would appear to this blogger that the "hippies and anti-war leftists in the United States want to make the Iraq war the political equivalent of Watergate.

Richard Millhouse Nixon was elected by a 1% majority vote as the 37Th President of the United States in 1968 using the "battle cry" of awakening the Silent Majority who detested the anti-American rhetoric of the Press and street protesters who helped bring defeat to American forces for the first time in History.

It is my opinion that they were determined to bring down Nixon long before he made the stupid mistake of not burning the oval office tapes.His career leading to his being elected twice as Vice-President and twice as President was one of exposing and fighting foes of America--Communists in government.

His investigation into the Communist involvement of State Department advisor to President Roosevelt at Yalta, Alger Hiss, lead to Hiss being jailed for perjury when asked if he was a Communist.

Long before this, he was elected in 1946 to his first term as a member of Congress, when he charged that Congressman Voorhis was "in Bed" with the California Communist dominated unions. This began a long career of anti-Communist activities by Nixon. Particularly as it involved members of government agencies.Thus the Leftist knives were being sharpened to "do in" Nixon long before Watergate.

It would appear that the now grown up "hippies" and anti-Vietnam war ilk have grown into the politicians, media persons, and academia that are determined to bring down President Bush.

Both men are known for their religious convictions. Nixon a Quaker from Whittier,California and Bush a Evangelical Christian from Texas who has been described by Boston Globe writer, Alan Jacobs "an intellectually mongrel"! Thus we see the connection between these two men who were and are hated by the Secular Humanists of this Country.

The one man in the Senate who has the B**ls to stand up to those in Congress who want to bring down the President by using the Iraq war as their whipping boy had this to say. “There is a very strong group within the party that I think doesn’t take the threat of Islamist terrorism seriously enough.” Lieberman says he is annoyed by the mudslinging on Capitol Hill and Democrats’ unwillingness to work with President Bush. But his critics say he has contributed to that polarization by his rhetoric and refusal to compel Bush to find a new way forward in Iraq. As Lieberman sees it, however, the Democratic Party has slipped away from its “most important and successful times” of the middle of last century, where it was tough on Communism and progressive on domestic policy. “I fear that some people take this position also because anything President Bush is for, they’ll be against, and that’s wrong,” said Lieberman, a staunch advocate of the war. “There’s a great tradition in our history of partisanship generally receding when it comes to foreign policy. But for the moment we’ve lost that.”

America needs the silent majority to awaken to the threat we face by abandoning the fight in Iraq. There will not be "A peace with Honor" if we turn tail and run home to momma!

DO WE REALLY WANT WHAT OBAMA IS SELLING?

During President Reagan's presidency the leftist media used the derogatory description of His being the "Teflon President". This was because no matter what happened around him and his administration the liberals could not make it stick! He always survived their attacks and derision.

Today we have a new "Teflon Man" running for the office of President, and his name is Barack Obama. The senator from Illinois whose beguiling smile and boy next door appearance hides a man whom this blogger believes is a dedicated Socialist in "middle of the road" clothing.

No matter what outrageous statements he makes during his campaign speeches the leftist media seem to ignore and portray this man as the next Kennedy.

Well, I am here to tell you that JFK would never have advocated post partum abortions, sex education for kindergarten children, who probably can't even spell sex. Nor would he have advocated meeting representatives of our adversaries North Korea, Iran and Cuba without any preconditions. Being a white Catholic JFK would not have chosen as his Church, a Church that advocates a "Black Value System" that disapproves of the "pursuit of middleclassness" and calls for it's parishioners "to be soldiers for Black Freedom!" This is just what Obamas Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago has as it's goals and principles.

The post partum abortion statement was made when speaking to Stem Cells-R-Us Convention. His words on abortion were"what difference does 2 or 3 minutes outside the womb really make." The sex education for kindergarten children was pushed at speech to Planned Parenthood meeting.

If this were not enough to disqualify him for a seat in the Oval Office. His advocacy of Universal health Care should. Putting aside all my objections based upon his immoral secular views about the things I have written above. American cannot afford this man. His plan for Universal health insurance has been estimated by his Campaign people to cost U.S. taxpayers between 50-65 billion dollars per year if enacted.
Senator Evan Bayh has a plan that he estimates will cost taxpayers 200-500 billion dollars over ten years if enacted, and the wealthy socialist from Massachusetts, Senator Kerry has one his people say will cost 700 billion!


Senator Hillary Clinton tried to sneak her version of universal health care(aka socialized medicine)during Bill Clinton's first term as President. I have written before on this Marxist socialist proposal, but an article on the Internet illustrates far better than I can the innate problems with socialized medicine. The article is written about England's grand experiment with universal health care.
The following is a quote from that article:
"British citizens pay obscenely large amounts of taxes, but get less and less in return for this, except an increasingly hostile state: “The National Health Service, where bureaucracies have hugely expanded and entwined their interests so closely with those of private suppliers and consultancies that it is difficult to distinguish public from private any longer. Spending on the NHS has increased by two and a half times in the space of 10 years; yet it is hard to see any corresponding improvement in the service, other than in the standard of living of those who work in it.”

HAVE WE ALREADY SURRENDERED?

There are at least two wars going on today that Americans are involved in, and surrender should not be an option. Unfortunately it appears to this blogger that surrender has already begun in both wars.

There is the war against AlQaeda terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan that "King" Harry Reid, Democrat Senate Majority Leader, has already declared lost. The other most important war, the war for freedom of religion and the right to free speech in America.

Even though our generals are making great progress in rooting out terrorists in Iraq, very little of which is being reported by our leftist media, the majority of American people have decided it is time to "put our tail between our legs" and withdraw from Iraq. This is a product of disinformation and anti- American bias by the media, academia and many who work for taxpayers dollars in the federal government. All 1.7 million of them at last count!

The other war has been going badly for those of us who would rather choose our own method of speech and worship our chosen faith in the manner our conscience and beliefs dictate. But once again people who get their paychecks from taxpayers hard work appear to be on a mission to tell us what we can and cannot say, and are marching toward the elimination of God in all forms of public discourse.

The Supreme Court and Congress have been the generals in this fight against two of the basic rights granted to us Citizens when they wrote the Constitution,and Bill of Rights. Worshipping at he alter of multiculturalism and Political correctness is the weapon of choice for those leftists who want to eliminate free speech and religion and replace them with pluralist secularism,

The government no longer appears to be representative of the people, but more concerned with perpetuating it's own bureaucratic mechanism. The more money it demands and collects in the form of taxes. The less things appear to be done for the good of "All The People".

Case in point is the Homeland Security Agency, a government bureaucracy with 165,00 employees and a budget in 2006 of 41.6 billion dollars. This Agency consists of 22 district agencies and bureaus. The border patrol is one of these agencies. It is responsible for 8000 miles of coast and land borders.The organization began in 1904 with mounted horsemen patrolling the Texas border who were given a pistol, uniform and badge. They were required to provide their own horse! Today it is a bureaucracy that had a budget of 6.7 billion in 2006.

Management and Administrative cost for the Agency was 77.2 million dollars in 2006, and for this the U.S Government Accountability Office estimates we got between 400,000 and 700,000 illegals who entering this country every year!

Today we have at last report 14,819 Border Patrol Agents who must take a "Academy" course that lasts 81 days and consists of among their other courses: 214 hours of Spanish instruction and law(plus after they graduate they spend 1 day a week for 20 weeks studying Spanish and Law again), . They get 67 hours learning to handle firearms! This course costs the taxpayer is $14,700 plus the cost of the salaries of the instructors, which is unreported in the GAO report from which I gathered this information.

There are 40,825 employees in the administrative staff of Robert Brown the commissioner of U.S Customs and ASa Hutchinson, Under Secretary for HSD has 324 employees and a budget for 2006 of $10,617,000! The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency has 15,440 employees under Assistant Secretary M.J. Garcia with a budget of $458,8 million.. Only $25 million is for the Marshals who do the actual enforcement not the bureaucratic Bull S**T!

Scummer Lays Down Gaunlet

Senator Charles Schumer laid down the political equivalent of a "gauntlet" to all Conservative voters this week.
The New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday "the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

Being a New York liberal who has voted against the nominations of President Bush's selections for the Supreme Court you would expect something like these words from him.

The Conservatives who are reluctant to get behind the President and the Republican party should consider the other side of the coin that Schumer just tossed into the political airwaves.
The Supreme Court has been twisting the words written by the founders of this great nation for over 40 years in a liberal attempt to reinterpret the "meaning " of the Constitution to suit their liberal bent. And the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution appears to be it's "whipping boy".
The Pyler vs. Doe case and the decision legalizing the murder of unborn babies, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) was a United States Supreme Court case that resulted in a landmark decision about abortion.[1] According to the Roe decision, most laws against abortion violated a constitutional right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision overturned all state and federal laws outlawing or restricting abortion that were inconsistent with its holdings. Roe is one of the most controversial and politically significant cases in U.S. Supreme Court history. Quote from the Court archives.In Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, the Supreme Court ruled that illegal immigrants are within the 'jurisdiction of the states they reside.' A footnote to their ruling stated that, "no plausible distinction with respect to Fourteenth Amendment "jurisdiction" can be drawn between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful." With the stroke of a pen the court added a new meaning to the 14Th Amendment and overturned two Previous Supreme Court decisions. It's no wonder that people have had, traditionally, so little regard for the Supreme Court. They do not render their decisions based upon the provisions of the Constitution; they alter the provisions of the Constitution to enable their subjective will upon the people. Quote from article written by Neal Ross For News With Views.com
For this reason alone the American people who treasure their freedom from a dictatorial and anti-personal freedom government, should pull all the Republican levers when they enter the voting booth in 2008.

This country cannot allow leftists like Edwards, Clinton or Obama to win a seat in the Oval Office, and New Yorkers with any conscience, should be ashamed of it's two Senators.

SO THIS IS HOW DEMOCRATS REFORM SPECIAL INTERESTS?

In 1933 during President Roosevelt's first term the depression was ravaging the farmers of America, so in the name of "The New Deal" Roosevelt and the Democrat controlled Congress passed the "Agricultural Adjustment Act". This bill created a large bureaucracy that hands over into today's government. In the Roosevelt years it was called "Agricultural Adjustment Administration."

Roosevelt, Eleanor Roosevelt, and many New Dealers were highly sympathetic to the marginal farmers who lived on the land in severe poverty, especially in the South. Major programs addressed to their needs included the Resettlement Administration (RA), the Farm Security Administration (FSA), the Rural Electrification Administration (REA), the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and rural welfare projects sponsored by the WPA, NYA, Forest Service and CCC, including school lunches, building new schools, opening roads in remote areas, reforestation, and purchase of marginal lands to enlarge national forests.

The AAA was the first program on such a scale on behalf of the troubled agricultural economy, and it established an important and long-lasting federal role in the planning on the entire agricultural sector of the economy.The problem was that the program dictated that excess production of milk above government established maximums had to be dumped, and hogs bred in excess of government maximums were slaughtered. We still have millions of pounds of rancid butter stashed in cave in the Mountain states that were shipped there to artificially control prices!

In 1936, the Supreme Court declared the AAA to be unconstitutional, stating that "a statutory plan to regulate and control agricultural production, [is] a matter beyond the powers delegated to the federal government..." The AAA was replaced by a similar program that did win Court approval. Federal regulation of agricultural production has been modified many times since then, but together with large subsidies it is still in effect in 2007.

In 1996 the Freedom To Farm Act was passed by Congress to get farmers off the dole they had become accustomed to under the FDR "New Deal" programs.The intent was for the subsidies to cease in 7years.

Subsidies for "farmers" are based upon historical land use. If it was planted with corn last year, but now lies uncultivated it still qualifies for a subsidy! What began in the 1930s as a limited safety net for working farmers has swollen into a far-flung infrastructure of entitlements that has cost $172 billion over the past decade. In 2005 alone, when pretax farm profits were at a near-record $72 billion, the federal government handed out more than $25 billion in aid, almost 50 percent more than the amount it pays to families receiving welfare.

Perfect examples of the Federal bureaucracy run amok is the following report in the Washington Post.Donald Matthews lives in El Campo, Texas on his sprawling 18 acre home site. Built in was once a part of a large rice field he receives direct federal payment from the Agriculture bureaucrats $1300 each year, because the land was once a rice field.
If this isn't bad enough how about the Surgeon in Huston, Dr. Jimmy F. Howell who received $490,709 over the last ten years in subsidies. 1.3 billion dollars have been paid since 2000 to people who do NO FARMING.

The Democrats took control of Congress in the last election by promising they would stop the "corruption" of the Republican Congress and stop payments to special interests.

Well there are lies, liars, and equivocators who get elected to Congress as Democrats. Case in point: the 2006 Farm subsidies that Congress approved were reported by the Washington Post as "having over 15 billion dollars in wasteful,unnecessary redundant spending." Over 95 billion dollars of taxpayers hard earned dollars have gone to subsidising "farmers".

I put farmers in quotes because not only the 707,576 farmers received subsidies but Fortune 500 companies like the John Hancock Life Insurance Company got 2.8 million dollars, David Rockefeller received $553,000,Ted Turner $206,000, Senator Charles Grasley of Iowa $225,000 and Representative John Salazar of Colorado got $161,000 in farm subsidies!

In 2006 President Bush asked Congress to limit taxpayer financed agriculture subsidies to farmers whose annual adjusted income is less than 200 thousand, but "Queen" Pelosi and her Democrat minions re-authorized subsidies for the next five years to farmers with income as high as one million dollars.

Ten percent of the 767,596 farmers who received farm subsidies got 60% of the total dollars distributed in 2006.

Some Chicago "Miracle Mile Farmers" in the Chicago zip code 60611 that includes downtown Michigan Avenue were well funded by Senators Durbin and Obama and their Congressional representatives.
Three billion dollars was sent to addresses on the "Miracle Mile"from 2003 to 2005 as farm subsidies!

Even former Bulls basketball star, Scottie Pippen got $75,000!

The average farmer makes $81,400 dollars per the 2002 US census figures, and has a net worth of over 835,000. farming is better than ever before, and there are very few farmers who go broke as did farmers in the 1930's. Many farmers sell their land to developers for the ever increasing spread of country living by former city residents.

What began in the 1930s as a limited safety net for working farmers has swollen into a far-flung infrastructure of entitlements that has cost $172 billion over the past decade. In 2005 alone, when pretax farm profits were at a near-record $72 billion, the federal government handed out more than $25 billion in aid, almost 50 percent more than the amount it pays to families receiving welfare!

And The Spending and LIES continue!

Why Younger Voters Should Not Vote Democrat

The Social Security system is primarily a pay-as-you-go system, meaning that payments to current retirees come from current payments into the system. In the early 1980s, however, expenditures were expected to exceed the revenues in the immediate future. In addition to fixing the short-term problem with tax increases, the Commission headed by Alan Greenspan took the projections which indicated that the eventual retirement of the numerous members of the post-World War II baby boom would cause expenses to exceed revenues. Accordingly, the Social Security tax was increased in 1983 so that it would be greater than necessary to pay for current expenditures, thus accumulating a reserve that could be drawn upon when necessary. The surplus is accounted for in the Social Security Trust Fund. As of the end of calendar year 2004, the accumulated surplus stood at approximately $1.7 trillion. [1] Projections are that current receipts will continue to exceed expenditures until 2018 or 2019. Thereafter, there will be a shortfall that will be made up by withdrawals from the Trust Fund, although the Trust Fund will continue to show net growth until 2025 because of the interest generated by its bonds. [2] The Trust Fund will gradually be drawn upon to cover the difference between tax receipts and benefit payments. It will be completely depleted by 2042 (according to the Social Security Administration) or 2052 (according to the Congressional Budget Office).
Social Security Trust Fund balances are available to finance future benefit payments and other Trust Fund expenditures – but only in a bookkeeping sense.... They do not consist of real economic assets that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits. Instead, they are claims on the Treasury that, when redeemed, will have to be financed by raising taxes, borrowing from the public, or reducing benefits or other expenditures. The existence of large Trust Fund balances, therefore, does not, by itself, have any impact on the Government’s ability to pay benefits. (from FY 2000 Budget, Analytical Perspectives, p. 337)

The Democrat candidates all advocate more programs as "plums" for those who are dumb enough to vote for them, and for those whose hand is always out for something someone else has earned. But more programs require not only more taxes, but more government employees to run the program. For this reason the Democrat solution is to repeal tax brakes that have revived the economic health of this country.
The liberal leaning Wikapedia describes the way to avert fiscal disaster in the social security program thus: "Fiscal policies made today will impact the government's ability to make good on its debt to Social Security. For example, according to some calculations, reversing the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts would more than suffice to redeem all of Social Security's assets (CBPP, Brookings)."

For all the 20-30 year olds who look at the smiling faces of the Democrats running for the Oval Office. They should consider this thought. Fifty years from now when they reach retirement age in the year 2070 and maybe as early as 2050 the Medicare health program that is so important to a senior citizen will be unfunded by 40 trillion dollars! This is based on present day costs of government. No telling how fast the underfunding will occur if Obama, Hillary or Edwards gets elected.

Just remember there is no free lunch except at the Salvation Army soup kitchens! All the smiling liberal platitudes disgorged by the candidates with their 400 dollar hair cuts and designer clothes, can't disguise the fact that for them to "give" all the programs they propose they will have to raise taxes severely. We could be looking at a tax rate of 60% of earned income for the vanishing middle class if these power happy socialists gain the White House and the Congress.

This is a fight for the personal freedom of Americans, and surrender is not an option! Young voters wake up!

Man Who Wants To Be President supports Baby Killing?

A man whose countenance looks like "butter won't melt in his mouth". You know him as the boy next door. But in reality he is allegedly advocating the killing of a born baby within seconds or minutes after the baby is born.
Not since biblical times when Herod ordered the killing of all male children under age two, have I heard a politician say murdering a newborn was legitimate.

If the following quote is accurate no Catholic or for that matter no Christian should consider allowing this anti-Christ to ever sit in the oval office. “When you get right down to it,” the Illinois Senator said before an audience at the recent Stem Cells R Us Annual Convention, “What difference does two or three minutes inside or outside the womb really make? One’s ‘late-term’ and the other’s ‘postpartum’. Who’s to say if the postpartum fetus is truly viable? Postpartum fetuses die all the time for all manner of reasons…”

If a full-term unborn baby can be called a “fetus” and aborted, then why not, right? There’s no significant theoretical or intellectual leap involved…".


What about the Constitution with it's right to LIFE. liberty and pursuit of happiness? This only applies to babies who leave the delivery room as I see his alleged statement!

This would be murder by an rational thinking man, and even his youthful education in a Muslim school would tell him the act is forbidden by the Quran because it is murder.

He is anti-Iraq War and pro-socialized medicine, and when he speaks of religion he uses these words:the title of his 2006 book, The Audacity of Hope, was inspired by his pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.[143] In Chapter 6 of the book, titled "Faith," Obama writes that he "was not raised in a religious household." He describes his mother, raised by non-religious parents, as detached from religion, yet "in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I have ever known." He describes his Kenyan father as "raised a Muslim," but a "confirmed atheist" by the time his parents met, and his Indonesian step-father as "a man who saw religion as not particularly useful." The chapter details how Obama, in his twenties, while working with local churches as a community organizer, came to understand "the power of the African American religious tradition to spur social change." Obama writes: "It was because of these new found understandings—that religious commitment did not require me to suspend critical thinking, disengage from the battle for economic and social justice, or otherwise retreat from the world that I knew and loved—that I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ one day and be baptized."[144]".

The Christian Church he belongs to on the South Side of Chicago is considered a leftist activist pulpit for black activists. Maybe his position on killing born babies is OK by them, I don't know, but it is not right with this blogger, and I reuse to call it anything but advocating murderer!

It Is Time For This Churchill to Go!

The Board of Regents of the University of Colorado will meet today to determine the stripping of a "cancer" left to long among the faculty at the great University located in Bolder, Colorado.

Ward Churchill has been a disgrace and disruptive force in his never earned position as a tenured professor at the U of C. The man doesn't even have PhD and yet was appointed full tenure as professor of Ethnic Studies. A fabricated title for the self proclaimed radical.

Mr.Churchill attended Sangaman State in Illinois where he received a BA and Ma from the "experimental" school for student radicals.Not even a recognized institute of college level education to my knowledge.

Among the other reasons for his being fired, and there are many. Is his claim that he was a member of a Cherokee Indian tribe. This proved to be an honorary membership which has since been revoked, but the "straw that broke the camels back" was his reference to the victims of the World Trade Center disaster on 9/11 as"little Eichmann's".

Professor Churchill's moment of fame came when an essay he had written was disclosed in which he waxed rhapsodic about the September 11 terrorist attacks as "chickens coming home to roost," while vilifying the innocent victims inside the World Trade Center "as little Eichmanns." The article was known to UC Boulder officials long before, and considered normal academic fare. Less well known is the fact that Professor Churchill's academic career and academic collection is built around the theory that the United States is a genocidal nation, worse than Nazi Germany, because its genocides began with its settlement and have continued to the present.

If that were not enough to get this walking cancer out of his "tenure" then maybe you should consider the following pronouncements: In Professor Churchill's view, "revolutionary violence against oppressive America is not only justified, it is indispensable. One of the things I've suggested is that it may be that more 9/11s are necessary. This seems like such a no-brainer that I hate to frame it in terms of actual transformation of consciousness." Lamenting that the terrorism of 9/11 had proved "insufficient to accomplish its purpose" of bringing the United States to its knees, Churchill shrugged, "What the hell? It was worth a try."

This man should not only be fired he should be arrested as a traitor who is inciting violence and sedition! For all of those who will say you are destroying the right of free speech. I remind you, it is criminal to yell "fire" in a crowded building if there is no fire. This situation with Churchill is similar!

A Liberal Bares His Teeth

Senator Feingold has once again bared his teeth showing his hatred for President Bush and all he stands for.

A Senator whom Wisconsin voters keep sending to Washington reminds me once again why I was glad to leave the state of my birth over 50 years ago. The middle west was once the conservative home to dairy farmers, brewers and cheese makers who loved their Country and their religious beliefs. Today they send a man to the U.S. Senate who supports same sex marriage, voted the only "nay" in 2002 when the Senate approved the 2001 Patriot Act, and was one of ten liberals to vote against renewal in 2006. This authorization has helped track and prevent untold numbers of terrorist acts from being perpetrated in the United States.

The Senator, who received a score of 98 of a possible 100 from the Americans for Democratic Action, a leftist organization, has now introduced a bill of Censure against President Bush. His four supporters of which only three agreed to be co-signers are well known leftist Senator Boxer, J. Kerry, Harkin and Leahy.He tried the Censure in 2006, but gained no support.

His animus for the Iraq war is long standing. He voted with 22 other Democrats to not grant President Bush the authorization to wage war against Saddam's regime in 2002. He has been a source of comfort to Bin Lauden and Al Qaeda by opposing the war publicly ever since it began. While advocating a universal health plan for the United States similar in design to that of Canada.

This Phi Beta Kappa and Rhodes scholar is not stupid. He is a bright and hateful man who will do anything to hurt President Bush.But in doing so he also ignores the fact that he gives aid and comfort to the enemy. The Islamists will kill him first if they ever get a chance, because of his refractory nature!

IT WAS EASIER 73 YEARS AGO TO KILL THE MOST WANTED

Seventy three years ago today the FBI finally caught and killed their "enemy number one". John Dillinger was shot to death as he left a downtown Chicago theater.

Today despite offers of 25 million dollar reward for information leading to his capture, and an additional reward of two million dollars by ALPA, Usama Bin Laden is free to plot his terrorism against America and the rest of the non-Muslim world.

This six foot four Saudi born millionaire has managed to stay free despite being number one on the FBI list of 21 most wanted terrorists in the world.

Dillinger was killed because of a leak in his circle of security. His alleged girlfriend "dropped a dime" on him to the FBI, and they were able to kill him as he came out of the movie. No such betrayal is forthcoming in the case of Usama.

There are too many dedicated Islamists protecting him and infiltrating government agencies all over the Western World plus America for this to happen. Any information gathered by the FBI or our other National security services like the CIA and Homeland Security Agency will quickly be leaked to the press and on to Osama.

We must rely on covert acts to ultimately get this killer! This rattles some peoples sensibilities, especially our fellow traveler liberals, But it is the only way we shall ever get him and the twenty other terrorists on the "most wanted list of the FBI>

The very heart of FBI operations lies in their investigations—which serve, as their mission, which states, "to protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats and to enforce the criminal laws of the United States." They currently have jurisdiction over violations of more than 200 categories of federal law.

The FBI and all other security agencies have their work made more difficult, and the covert operations of the military agencies more dangerous because of organizations like Hizb ut Tahrir.
This once covert Islamic group of zealots is now present throughout the Western World. They are you shall see a dedicated group of infiltrating Muslims with a deliberate and dedicate purpose.
Hizb-ul-Tahrir began as an underground movement with a unique mandate to restore the Caliphate and unify all Muslims in Central Asia and from there the entire world. They are the most vocal and have their own website.It also has it's own Constitution. Brief reading of their documents reveals they hate and want to kill all Jews, and We are in the sights also.

The following is an excerpt from article 184 of the 186 articles of their Constitution. It explains very well why this organization is a threat to every Country that wishes to stay free from conversion to Islam and obedience to Sharia law.

3. "States with whom we do not have treaties, the actual imperialist states, like Britain, America and France and those states that have designs on the State, like Russia are considered to be potentially belligerent states. All precautions must be taken towards them and it would be wrong to establish diplomatic relations with them. Their subjects may enter the Islamic State only with a passport and a visa specific to every individual and for every visit, unless it became a real belligerent country

4. With states that are actually belligerent states, like Israel, a state of war must be taken as the basis for all measures and dealings with them. They must be dealt with as if a real war existed between us - whether an armistice exists or not - and all their subjects are prevented from entering the State."

Their Constitution concludes with this scary premise and rule:
Article 186
"The State is forbidden to belong to any organisation that is based on something other than Islam or which applies non-Islamic rules. This includes international organisations like the United Nations, the International Court of Justice, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and regional organisations like the Arab League."

This organization has been operating openly in Great Britain for many years. Two years ago because of their subversive actions there were moves made to make this organization illegal, but Political Correctness and Multi-culturism have prevented the Government from acting. There is no knowledge by this blogger of how strong their organization is here in the United States, but you can bet they are here working now!

CONFUSING FREEDOM WITH LICENSE

THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION STATES:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Unfortunately this amendment is being used against us Americans by a "cult" that professes to be a religion of peace, but was founded by a tyrant who believed: "It is not fitting for a Muslim man or woman to have any choice in their affairs when a matter has been decided for them by Allah and His Messenger. They have no option." Qur'an 33:36

He also proclaimed this: "Against them (the unbelievers) make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.” Quran 8.06.


And if that is not enough he also proclaimed: "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guides not a people unjust." Quran 5:51

Compare those "religious" proclamations to the following: “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.” Bible (Matthew 5:44) A phrase that aptly describes the precepts of Christianity, and then ask yourself if the framers of the Constitution intended to allow freedom to practice a dogma that not only dictates a persons way of life, but also the total control over persons mind and body. Recognizes no law except Sharia law and the Quran?

The following is a quote from Muslim scholar Amil Imali. A man who became an "apostate" of the Muslim "religion", and now writes books and articles about the dangers of the Muslim growing encroachment on America.


"Any religion that seeks to create its own “State” and its own legal system and seeks to mobilize its own militia is itself not interested in separation of church and State, and has no right to use that separation to create hegemony."

Our elites in the major Universities who are predominantly secularist liberals have spent the years since the sixties proclaiming that Christianity is part of the evil that is Western and American values.
Islam receives no such angst from these religion haters. When The cartoon was published that made fun of Muhammad, the founder of Islam(570-632). The rioting in the streets and property destruction was, if not justified called expected response to the "slur".
No such treatment was accorded the Christians in 1988 when they peacefully demonstrated outside theaters showing the Martin Scorsese film "The Last Temptation of Christ". The demonstrators were referred to as "radical right wing Christians". A pejorative consideration at the very least!

It is in this area where Americans appear to have become confused. Along with the other political correct concepts, freedom is wrongly interchanged with license!
Freedom grants individuals independence and opportunity. License results often in anarchy, and consists of profligration,unrestraint and entitlement. If it feels good do it, and don't speak ill of anything different than you, are good examples.

While we are thinking "PC", the Muslims are increasing their influence and presence all over America, and if WE the American people don't come to the realization that the enemy is within us. We will before long be living at the very least in a fragmented society of Muslim enclaves where Sharia law rules and ghettos where the rest of us "infidels" try to live with the Constitution and rights granted to us by the Constitution.





His act was an act of a first-class terrorist. He did not congratulate them because he knew that they entered Islam by force. Is this man really the prophet of freedom, compassion, and human rights? Listen carefully! These oppressive attitudes and actions are as clear as the sun on a bright summer day. Muhammad's words are self-explanatory:

"Had you not accepted Islam I would have beheaded you and cast your heads under your feet!"

What human rights! What compassionate, kind, meek and noble characters! Undoubtedly, this alone is enough to uncover the dreadful dark side of Muhammad's character and his religion.

CLINTON AND WAXMAN SHOULD BE CENSURED

It is difficult to express my angst for two people in the Congress of the United States for their acts of treachery.

Hillary Clinton, the carpet bag Senator from New York, and current aspirant to the Presidency has done more to help embolden the terrorists who are killing our boys and girls who wear the uniform of the United States than anyone since Congressman Murtha.

Even though she voted to fight the war in Iraq originally, she is now on the "stump" acting like John Kerry. Her speeches are filled with anti-war rhetoric to attract her leftist anti-Bush base.

But publicly asking the defense department to begin drawing up a plan to withdraw the troops and all support equipment, is a heinous act. It further adds to the calumny that Senator(I am King) Reid did when he declared the war is
lost.
Our enemy has full access to the media. They even have one of their own in Aljazeera, so they learn about things like this as soon as we Americans do. If they don't learn it before we do from their moles inside the State Department and other Government agencies. Don't doubt for a second that they are not infiltrated within our government. They are fanatics, and their leadership is very cleaver and determined.

Congressman Waxman, Democrat from California 30th district represents Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, West lake Village and most of the California's southern gold coast. Home to many media and movie stars and moguls who are as far left as you can get. He is an advocate for "tree hugging" environmentalists, and in 2006 introduced "The Safe Climate Act". An act to help stop "global warming".

The following is a quote from two article written in today's edition of the "The New Media Journal".

"Under Secretary of Defense Eric Edelman wrote a biting reply to questions Clinton raised in May, urging the Pentagon to start planning now for the withdrawal of US troops. A copy of Edelman's response, dated July 16, was obtained Thursday by The Associated Press. Premature and public discussion of the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq reinforces enemy propaganda that the United States will abandon its allies in Iraq, much as we are perceived to have done in Vietnam, Lebanon and Somalia," Edelman wrote. He added that "such talk understandably unnerves the very same Iraqi allies we are asking to assume enormous personal risks." Clinton, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has privately and publicly pushed Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Peter Pace two months ago to begin drafting the plans for what she said will be a complicated withdrawal of troops, trucks and equipment.
A New York Times best-selling author says members of the supposed "peace movement" delivered hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash and supplies to terrorists engaged in a bloody street battle against United States Marines in Iraq. The latest book by Lt. Col. Robert "Buzz" Patterson (US Air Force-Ret.) is called War Crimes: The Left's Campaign to Destroy Our Military and Lose the War on Terror. In the book, he claims that two anti-war groups -- "United for Peace & Justice" and "CODEPINK: Women for Peace" -- literally gave aid and comfort to terrorists when they delivered $600,000 in cash and supplies they claim was humanitarian aid to civilians. According to Patterson, Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) facilitated the transaction for CODEPINK by signing a letter allowing them to get the cash and supplies into Fallujah...Patterson says that is not the only treacherous thing these groups have done. "When the Iraq war first started, CODEPINK and Medea Benjamin went to Baghdad and opened an office designed to try to encourage American soldiers to desert, go AWOL, and not fight the war," he explains."

In years past people who commited acts like these were Censured if not imprisoned, hanged or shot. These liberals should reflect upon what will happen to them if they get their way, and the genocide that follows in Iraq will be because of their aid and comfort to the Islamst terrorists!


Congressman Henry Waxman and Senator Hillary Clinton have demonstrated to me that they are giving aid and comfort to the enemy during a time of war and should be at the very least censured by their respective Congressional groups.

Waxman, a long time congressional supporter of "tree hugging" environmentalists represents the 30th Congressional district of California. A district that includes WestLake Village, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica along the Southern California gold coast. This area is filled with movie mgules, movie stars and wealthy leftists who all vote for the issues he supports.

He has been a Bush hater ever since the President was first elected, and a anti-Iraq war supporter from the beginning of the war. His actions to help "Code Pink" and "United For Peace and Justice" deliver 600K to the Iraq "insurgents" is an infamous act!

The blood of those murdered in Iraq, including the skeleton U.S. force left behind, after our military pulls out and retreats will be on their hands!

AMERICAS LEFT AND TAQIYA

The Arabic word for deception is Taqiya, and it is a doctrine used very successful by those who hate and wish to destroy us and those members of the leftist clique that presently run both Congress and the Main Stream Media.

There are two large forces that exist today who are gloating over the American leftists who have an apparent suicide wish for our Country, and ultimately themselves.

AlQaeda,created by Saudi Wahabis, and The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and their millions of followers. Supported by the tens of millions of Muslims worldwide who are either afraid or choose not to speak out against the Islamist terrorism, take comfort in the fact that most Americans have bought into the "Taqiya" that if we withdraw our troops from Iraq, Americans will be safer than we are now.

The big lie that too many "well meaning simpletons" have bought, is that only a small percentage of Muslims are "bad guys". There is a Muslim word for these people, Mufsidoon. These are terrorists who wage a wrong war. The concept was created by Saudi Wahabis and the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt to confuse Westerners so as to not use the words Jihad and Jihadism to describe their terrorist activities that have been committing all over the World.

The simple fact is that for a person to be a Muslim they must abide by the dictates of the Quran. This includes the dominance of Sharia law over all human activity and supersedes all other laws.

Holland, Canada, England and France have already experienced Muslim demands for the adoption of Sharia law. When we withdraw from Iraq these people will get the idea that America is a Country that won't fight for what we believe. These people consider Iraq just one battle involving a world wide "crusade" to establish Sharia law. The next battle field could be Manhattan, Lisbon, Munich or London.

Islamism is very similar to cancer. Like cancer it starts with a small cluster of cells. If left untreated or eradicated by cutting it out it will eventually overtake and consume the host!

Fanatics like Ahmadinajad, Khomeini and their followers will rejoice and be emboldened by our withdrawal from Iraq. When the next person asks you what would be so wrong with living under Sharia law. Ask him to speak to Amil Imani, an Iranian born American, who fled Iran when The Islamist took over. He didn't like the public hangings, or the killing of women who had been raped!

Michael Chertoff Needs To Go!

Unless you have been in a coma or just arrived from another galaxy .You know the Baptists, Catholics, Methodists, Quakers or Jews have not waged a war of terror against this Country and most of Europe since 9/11/01.

Why then does the man who is charged with national security visit mosques, and speaking to a meeting of the NAACP, ask them to fight for the rights of Muslim Americans?

If he bothered to read it, the Pew Research Institute poll of Muslim youth aged 18-29 found that 26% percent believed suicide bombing was justified!

The recent estimates of the number of Muslims in the United States is 2.35 million people. Of these almost 31% are youths aged 18-29. This is a group of 183,000 people who live in this country who believe suicide bombing is justified. All are home grown potential terrorists, and the man who can't even keep our borders secure is advocating support for their rights!

If a poll revealed that 26% of American youths thought that driving under the influence should not be a crime. The story would make front page headlines and highlight the nightly TV news.The Pew poll received scant coverage.

It is time for people, especially government appointed or elected people who are responsible for our security, to seriously confront the issues at stake. Our very freedom depends upon it.

It would be appropriate if Mr. Chertoff and his ilk would visit every mosque he could, and ask those present and their leadership to denounce the terrorists who carry out the heinous acts in the name of Allah. This should be a request for a public statement that has never been precisely spoken by the Imams and the leadership of the Muslim advocacy groups.

All these groups do is preach tolerance for them publicly, and use their political influence and Saudi funded money to advance their cause. Let there be no mistake their cause is the establishment of Sharia law in place of our laws and Constitution.
And they don't care how long it takes!

Unlike the Congress of the United States and too many Americans,they don't expect a "quick fix", or they will end it all as we are planning to do in Iraq. They are patiently doing their internal revolution while the terrorists they support do their deadly deeds.

WILL PRESIDENT BUSH BE PONTIUS PILATE OF IRAQ?

Please pray for our Patriot Armed Forces standing in harm’s way around the world, and for their families, especially those of our fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who have died in defense of American liberty while prosecuting the war with Jihadistan.

President Bush has already declared "Mission Accomplished" so It will not surprise me if he pulls a biblical act of washing his hands of the war in Iraq.

The Congress and the sheep who feed of the trash that the min stream media feed them have collectively determined that the Iraq War is a lost cause.

Of course you would expect the media elites and the Democrats to declare defeat. They hate anything Bush is involved in. It's that Texan with the religious bent that makes them hate him, you see, yaawl!

But the President may pull a Pontius Pilate,( Roman Governor of Judea from 26-36AD)and sign the bill that is passing through the Congress and will soon be voted out of the Senate.

You see, the President doesn't want to torpedo the whole Republican party. By vetoing this bill he will put the Republicans running for election in 2008 in the position of having to defend their votes either up or down on the measure.

If he signs the bill he will "hand the ball" of to the Democrats, and when the slaughter of the troops who are not lucky enough to go home but remain as a skeleton defense force and the genocide of the Sunni Iraqis begins. Bush can say "I told you so", and the Democrats will have to answer to their voters back home!