EUGENICS HAS APOSITION IN THE WHITE HOUSE

Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.” —Ronald Reagan

Yesterday, Obama gave a speech to the 100th anniversary meeting of the NAACP. In his speech he stressed that racism is still alive in the USA.First of all this is strange for the first Black president to say as he was elected not by the Blacks(although they contributed heavily) but by a predominantly white population.
And he said all during his campaign that he wanted to heal a divided country.
All his speech did was make the point that Black people should hate white people and the RICH!

It would be a good idea for him to look at whom he appointed as the head of his Office of Science and Technology a little closer.
This man is a modern day equivalent of Margaret Sanger. The originator of eugenics. The science of weeding out the "undesirable and infirmed population via abortion and sterilization! And while he is examining those in government who believe in eugenics. He should read what the far left Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg had to say about Roe and abortions.
In an interview last week, Ginsburg said that she thought "at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
I wonder what race of people she was talking about? Apparently she thinks like the Left wing Democrats who tried to block the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2, 1964), a landmark piece of legislation in the United States that outlawed racial segregation in schools, public places, and employment.

Conceived to help African Americans, the bill was amended prior to passage to protect women, and explicitly included white people for the first time. It also created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. And it was passed despite the fact that President Johnson realized that supporting this bill would risk losing the South's overwhelming support of the Democratic Party. Both Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Vice President Johnson had pushed for the introduction of the civil rights legislation. Johnson told Kennedy aide Ted Sorensen that "I know the risks are great and we might lose the South, but those sorts of states may be lost anyway."[17] Senator Richard Russell, Jr. warned President Johnson that his strong support for the civil rights bill "will not only cost you the South, it will cost you the election."[18] The South indeed started to vote increasingly Republican after 1964.Source: Wikapedia

In "Woman and the New Race," Sanger insisted that women create an enormous "debt to society by creating slums, filling asylums with the insane, and institutions with other defectives.Poverty and the large family generally go hand in hand.The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Of blacks, Sanger wrote, "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

She advocated policies that ensured "more children from the fit, less from the unfit" in order to "to create a race of thoroughbreds." (Remember this quote the next time a liberal tells you that Fascists and Socialists have nothing in common.)

Sanger was certainly the 20th century's most noted American proponent of racist eugenics. However when we remind our liberal friends of the origins of Planned Parenthood, they sputter on about Sanger's support for eugenics being an anomaly of another time and context.

But Sanger's advocacy for the extermination of the "unwanted" is the basis of today's culture of death. Indeed, one of the adherents of eugenics now directs BHO's White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and is the co-chair of Obama's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology.

John Holdren may not be openly advocating racial selection, but he clearly advocates mass sterilization and abortion in order to control human impact on the environment. This is nothing but a contemporary interpretation of Sanger's eliminating "human weeds" and "reckless breeders.
In writing with Paul R. Ehrlich, Holdren claimed that, "if the population control measures are not initiated immediately, and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come." In 1973 Holdren encouraged a decline in fertility to well below replacement in the United States, because "210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many".

Holdren's modern day eugenics program is outlined in a book he co-authored, "Ecoscience," in which he calls for "a comprehensive Planetary Regime [in order to] control the development, administration, conservation and distribution of all natural resources."

One solution, writes Holdren, is "adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods" which would help weed out those "who contribute to social deterioration."

As for the constitutional authority, Holdren writes, "Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society."

Holdren concludes, "This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants' destiny. Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world." Source: Mark Alexander, Patriot Post

So what is Obama doing? He is stirring the pot of race hatred. An old trick of Communists and Socialists to gain more power. Blacks have advanced more in the last 30 years than they ever did for the 40 years that Congress was under control of the Democrats. Even the courts have bent over backwards to advance people of color, as evidenced by the Sotomayor decision in the New York fireman's law suit!